• Hi Guest! Forum rules have been updated. All users please read here.

Boeing Model 733-606-12 Supercruise Project

Orionblamblam

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2006
Messages
8,107
Reaction score
1,603
Website
www.aerospaceprojectsreview.com
lark said:
I'm still convinced that a patent drawing is not an illustration of a project.
It's only a drawing made for the better understanding of an invention...

Sometimes yes, sometimes no. This patent, for example... http://www.google.com/patents?id=T1wtAAAAEBAJ&printsec=abstract&zoom=4&dq=4828204&num=100

.... shows the Boeing Model 733-606-12 supercrusie demonstrator project from about 1977. It is a rare patent in that it is quite detailed and the accuracy jives with what I have from other sources.
 

lark

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2006
Messages
1,811
Reaction score
98
In this case : agree...

It could have been on the Boeing drawing board as a corporate SST proposal.
 

smurf

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Sep 6, 2006
Messages
549
Reaction score
42
It is a rare patent in that it is quite detailed
and to that extent , as a patent seeking to protect an invention, it is quite baffling. How can its early claims stand? Most of its various features individually are surely by 1983 subject to prior publication, or obvious. Taken together they are so restricted in scope that moderate variations in design would circumvent the patent. Perhaps its purpose was to act itself as 'prior publication' held in secret during the application period to prevent other patentees interfering with Boeing's line of development?
But this is a long way from the subject of the thread.
 

Orionblamblam

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2006
Messages
8,107
Reaction score
1,603
Website
www.aerospaceprojectsreview.com
lark said:
In this case : agree...

It could have been on the Boeing drawing board as a corporate SST proposal.

It was a proposal (designed at least in part under NASA contract) for a supercruise demonstrator for supersonic transports. but I've seen it in USAF colors in a lot of artwork and at the Bopeing archive in model form, so I've little doubt that an interceptor variant or possibly strike, or possibly recon, or possibly highpriority transport) was also proposed. I think it'd be just way too big and expensive to be a commercial/corporate passenger plane.
 

Sundog

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2006
Messages
2,876
Reaction score
366
When I was in college, my Senior Aircraft Design Class had some very high quality blueprints of this design, about eleven and one half inches high by about two and a half feet long. In fact, we had high quality drawings for most of the SST drawings/design studies as well. We weren't allowed to make copies of them, but I wish I would have anyway. :-\
 

Stargazer2006

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2009
Messages
13,227
Reaction score
644
Is the Model 733-606-12 the same as the so-called "Model 606" shown here? Certainly looks it.
 

Attachments

  • 606a.jpg
    606a.jpg
    51.9 KB · Views: 580
  • 606b.jpg
    606b.jpg
    69.2 KB · Views: 570
  • 606c.jpg
    606c.jpg
    57.7 KB · Views: 595

Meteorit

ACCESS: Secret
Joined
Jan 5, 2006
Messages
425
Reaction score
35
Probable Boeing 733-606 image from "Aeronautical Technology 2000: A Projection of Advanced Vehicle Concepts" (http://hdl.handle.net/2060/19860003767), titled Advanced Fighter Aircraft.
 

Attachments

  • 1986_Boeing 733-606.jpg
    1986_Boeing 733-606.jpg
    176.5 KB · Views: 593

hesham

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
27,771
Reaction score
4,890
Hi,


http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19950005076_1995105076.pdf
 

Attachments

  • 733-606.JPG
    733-606.JPG
    27 KB · Views: 436

Similar threads

Top