• Hi Guest! Forum rules have been updated. All users please read here.

AGM-109/BGM-109 Tomahawk/Gryphon

fightingirish

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2006
Messages
2,479
Reaction score
996
A few pictures showing a A-6 carrying and launching a Tomahawk cruise missile can be found at the San Diego Air & Space Museum on Flickr.
Link: http://www.flickr.com/search/?ss=2&w=49487266%40N07&q=A-6A&m=text

I can't tell, if the Tomahawk is an early AGM-109A or AGM-109C/H/I/J/K/L prototype later on the MRASM (Medium-Range Air-to-Surface Missile) program. The MRASM effort was cancelled in 1984.
Source: http://www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/m-109.html
 

Attachments

  • A-6A_Tomahawk_SDASM_archives.jpg
    A-6A_Tomahawk_SDASM_archives.jpg
    88.6 KB · Views: 171

Boxman

ACCESS: Secret
Senior Member
Joined
May 6, 2007
Messages
313
Reaction score
151
Going through some of the San Diego Air & Space Museum (SDASM) photo stream on Flickr, and I came across these photos (dated 30-June-1975) concerning testing of the Tomahawk Cruise Missile. Note the "Event" described on the form says "C.M. Inflatable Inlet Tests." Presumably, "C.M." stands for "Cruise Missile". What intrigues me is the use of the description "inflatable inlet." Perhaps what the photographer meant to describe was the deployment of the Tomahawk's intake via pneumatic pressure, but if not, is anyone aware of an inflatable inlet or inlet "lip" being used/considered for the Tomahawk? You will probably want to have a look at the scanned photos in their largest resolution (full resolution images linked here).


http://www.flickr.com/photos/sdasmarchives/7218183232/in/photostream
7218183232_b1575cf58f.jpg


EDIT: For comparison and contrast, here are additional photos, from August 24,1975, documenting the filming of the test deployment of the Tomahawk's inlet (apparently, not an "inflatable" type) (link to full resolution here).
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sdasmarchives/7218186546/in/photostream
7218186546_2305b5541d.jpg
 

carsinamerica

ACCESS: Confidential
Joined
Feb 19, 2010
Messages
113
Reaction score
21
Wasn't the AGM-109 (the original strategic variant with a W-80, not the tactical MRASM) supposed to have some sort of range advantage compared to the AGM-86B? I seem to remember that. At any rate, I'm pretty sure that the B-52 could only carry six of the AGM-109s on the CSRL, as compared to eight AGM-86Bs.

Interesting picture up-threat, too, with a B-52D carrying ALCMs. I didn't know that was ever contemplated for the D/E/F series, only for the G/H models.
 

Mark Nankivil

ACCESS: Top Secret
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2007
Messages
1,669
Reaction score
695
Greetings All -

From the Plane-A-Day site, a photo of the General Dynamics MRASM in a red, white and blue scheme. Woyuld think this is a stage image, the inlet and flying surfaces are all deployed.

Enjoy the Day! Mark
 

Attachments

  • General Dynamics MRASM.jpg
    General Dynamics MRASM.jpg
    112.1 KB · Views: 245

fightingirish

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2006
Messages
2,479
Reaction score
996
Robert Lynch, Father of the Tomahawk
Robert A. Lynch was the engineering director for the Navy's Tomahawk cruise missile program from 1972 to 1979. This is a recording of a talk he gave at the San Diego Air and Space Museum in the Spring of 2012.
From the archives of the San Diego Air and Space Museum http://www.sandiegoairandspace.org Please do not use for commercial purposes without permission.
This video is 58 min long.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CoU_CmZt2Yo
Code:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CoU_CmZt2Yo
 

Grey Havoc

The path not taken.
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2009
Messages
14,575
Reaction score
4,301
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=jDujPAYjwPg
(h/t C.Puffs over at MilitaryPhotos.net)
 

sferrin

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2011
Messages
13,888
Reaction score
2,165
MRASM and Tomahawk in old USN blue. (Black I guess.) There are many other pics of the latter article up on Flickr.
 

Attachments

  • MRASM.jpg
    MRASM.jpg
    257.9 KB · Views: 281
  • Tomahawk Blue.jpg
    Tomahawk Blue.jpg
    348.8 KB · Views: 249

totoro

ACCESS: Secret
Joined
Jan 11, 2011
Messages
399
Reaction score
129
As per various news, older IV tomahawks will be remanufactured into block V missiles. But what's interesting is that text mention there will be three (3) variants produced. Yet I know of only two variants so far. The Va - maritime strike variant. And the Vb - the conventional warhead but with enhanced bunker busting capabilities. But that leaves one variant unaccounted for? Does anyone know what its designation is? And if it actually exists, what sort of warhead or role does it have?
 

TomS

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2008
Messages
4,692
Reaction score
1,904

totoro

ACCESS: Secret
Joined
Jan 11, 2011
Messages
399
Reaction score
129
Thanks, guys!
So... there's not going to be any submunition variant of tomahawk? Does the US even have any stand off submunition dispenser system currently in use? One JSOW variant, maybe? But nothing powered?
 

Grey Havoc

The path not taken.
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2009
Messages
14,575
Reaction score
4,301
Submunition R&D, not to mention production, still hasn't really recovered yet from the depredations of the Obama era. In part because there are still quite a few officials in high positions, uniformed and otherwise, who climbed the slippery ladder (often over far better people) precisely because of patronage from various U.S. politicians who have promoted stupidities like the Ottawa and Dublin treaties for a long time.
 

totoro

ACCESS: Secret
Joined
Jan 11, 2011
Messages
399
Reaction score
129
So, I was trying to get a sense of the Tomahawk missile family production history and inventory. Perhaps someone can help me with that.
So far I have this:
Some 8500 missiles of all variants produced so far.

With 4201 of those produced before year 2000.
Of those, at least 689 (but possibly more?) were TLAM-N and Gryphon.
And there were several hundred of TASMs, though I'd like to find a more precise number.

Some 4300 or so tomahawk block IV were made in addition to those 4201 older missiles.
Though, it's possible some were counted as new while in fact they were remanufactured older blocks. does anyone have any data on those?
I did find that at least 724 and possibly 784 older block, TASMs and such were remanufactured into block IIIs.

When it comes to expended missiles, at least 2193 missiles were fired in wars. Actual figure may be higher, these are just the recorded/known firings.
A certain number were also surely fired in testing over the decades.
I did find one mention of 2500 missiles fired over the years.

Surely, a lot of the old block I and block IIs were simply not even remanufactured but were scrapped entirely. But i don't know how many.
And probably only a smaller number of block IVs were ever fired. Since block IV entered production, only 305 firings were announced, and a good deal of those might have been older block IIIs.

So, the questions remain: how many block IVs might there be in inventory? and how many block IIIs might remain (if any?) in inventory?
And does the above all mean that as many as 2000 older tomahawks were simply scrapped? (assuming roughly 4000 tomahawks in inventory remaining today)
 

Similar threads

Top