The Payen configuration is already.....erm.... let's go with compromised, so you may as well have fun with it.
Unfortunately, the canceled tests of Pa.101 and Pa.22 /2 - Pa.22 / 5, which only made straight lines above the runway (the first for a too "hard" landing, the second on German decision after several escapes from France of other planes) will never provide the answer.
We can only see that the reduced models produced later (Pa.100 or 22 with "in line" engines, never the 101, modified 100 with an oversized radial engine) had good behavior in flight, but had very big difficulties staying in a straight line during the take-off phase (I never saw one of them able to take off from a runway).
In this sense, we can also notice that the Pa.22 / 2 had two extensions / modifications of the fin (to finish in version 22/5). But, on the other hand, the pilot of the Pa.101 had declared that he was staying in a straight line. As this is only a statement and there is no film of the aircraft in flight (only one slow show on the grass, which disappeared of the free web some years ago), it is difficult to judge.
The only possible comparison of the time, even if far, seems to me to be the Russian Moskalyev SAM 9 Strela, ogival delta with in line engine and without canards but with a cockpit placed more forward, which flew correctly, at least officially.
Otherwise, for the fun with it, I have. And, thanks to, for example, SPF forumers like Citrus90, leaded50 and others, including on other forums, like Slava Trudu, It's not about to end