Register here

Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
Postwar Aircraft Projects / Re: Lockheed CL400 Suntan
« Last post by CJGibson on Today at 09:48:22 pm »
May I ask a very stupid question?

Why do some of these CL-400 documents have the date '1973' - assuming that is a date?

Chris
3
Designation Systems / Re: Tupolev aircraft
« Last post by major-1 on Today at 09:30:10 pm »
-

4
Aerospace / Re: Lockheed Martin F-35: News ONLY topic
« Last post by marauder2048 on Today at 08:57:19 pm »
GBU-49 + F-35B @ Somewhere in the Arabian Sea.

https://www.dvidshub.net/image/4968026/uss-essex-2018-deployment
5
Aerospace / Re: Lockheed Martin F-35: News ONLY topic
« Last post by TomS on Today at 08:14:34 pm »
Hey, folks.  News ONLY, remember.
6
Postwar Aircraft Projects / Re: Lockheed CL400 Suntan
« Last post by Orionblamblam on Today at 08:09:58 pm »
I'm with GTX, I can chip in as well, if we can find someone to do the research.

Given the low price-per-person at this point (handwave: under $15), I'm happy with taking a gamble and getting what we get, so long as the dross like magazine articles are filtered out. If nothing else, we'd *know.*


Quote
I would also like to know what is in the Northrop Corporation section as well.

Box 2 Subseries 2: Blueprints and Technical Drawings
Box 3 Subseries 2: Blueprints and Technical Drawings
Box 4 Subseries 2: Blueprints and Technical Drawings
Box 5 Subseries 2: Blueprints and Technical Drawings
Box 6 Subseries 2: Blueprints and Technical Drawings
Box 7 Subseries 2: Blueprints and Technical Drawings
Box 8 Subseries 2: Blueprints and Technical Drawings
Box 9 Subseries 2: Blueprints and Technical Drawings
Box 10 Subseries 2: Blueprints and Technical Drawings
Box 11 Subseries 2: Blueprints and Technical Drawings
Box 12 Subseries 2: Blueprints and Technical Drawings
Box 13 Subseries 2: Blueprints and Technical Drawings

Is that not enough detail? What more information could you *possibly* hope for?
7
Aerospace / Re: Lockheed Martin F-35: News ONLY topic
« Last post by kcran567 on Today at 07:33:44 pm »
How practical as a combat fighter is the F-35 if it is this delicate?
Unless it is operating in ideal situations against an inferior opponent?
Must be kept in sterile conditions and will be maintenance heavy?
That's why I've always liked the practical and realistic Russian philosophy to build durability and for combat (whether out of necessity or other reasons).
All the criticism the Su-57 is getting.
8
Example:

"oh-6a site:dtic.mil"

https://www.google.com/search?q=oh-6a+site%3Adtic.mil

"site:" restricts the search results to a single site or domain.
9
Postwar Aircraft Projects / Re: Lockheed CL400 Suntan
« Last post by quellish on Today at 07:26:45 pm »

Anyone live near San Marino, CA? Might be worth a visit with a digital camera :)

Huntington is near Caltech, about 1 hours drive from me. If I did not now have a 2 year old driving all of my schedule I would go.
10
Military / Re: Next Chinese aircraft carrier
« Last post by Sherman Tank on Today at 07:23:20 pm »
Or training carriers like the Lexington and the Forrestal.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10