Register here

Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
So they're looking at something like 5-6 tankers per carrier?  Which would come, one would expect, on top of 48 or so combat planes (not counting the Growlers) ?

No problem at all as the 10 S-3 Vikings and 10 Intruders are long gone with no replacement.
2
So they're looking at something like 5-6 tankers per carrier?  Which would come, one would expect, on top of 48 or so combat planes (not counting the Growlers) ?
3
Aerospace / Re: Northrop B-2A
« Last post by bobbymike on Today at 06:46:17 am »
29 years ago today. Magnificent airplane but where's my hypersonic strike bomber?
8
The Bar / Re: Nuclear Weapons - Discussion.
« Last post by sferrin on Yesterday at 06:55:37 pm »
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-nuclear-modernize-specialreport/special-report-in-modernizing-nuclear-arsenal-u-s-stokes-new-arms-race-idUSKBN1DL1AH?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=Social

I don't know what's more annoying, that the author has an agenda or if they really are that stupid.  They'd have to be living in a hole to not know what China and Russia are doing with their nuclear forces.  (Then again I'd be surprised if they knew anymore than, "US nukes are bad, and this is why".)
10
The Bar / Re: Nuclear Weapons - Discussion.
« Last post by sferrin on Yesterday at 05:29:22 pm »
From nearly half a century ago. . .

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10