Hi! Weapon system 125.

"The WS-125 was an American super long-range strategic bomber project during the cold War to develop a nuclear-powered aircraft, which was scheduled to be designated the B-72.
In 1954, the United States Air Force (USAF) issued a weapons system requirement for a nuclear-powered bomber, designated WS-125. In 1956, GE teamed up with Convair (X211 program) and Pratt & Whitney with Lockheed in competitive engine/airframe development to address the requirement.
In 1956, the USAF decided that the proposed WS-125 bomber was unfeasible as an operational strategic aircraft. Finally, after spending more than 1 billion dollars, the project was cancelled on March 28, 1961.
Powerplants
Two General Electric J87 turbofan engines were successfully powered to nearly full thrust using two shielded reactors.

 

Attachments

  • image019.jpg
    image019.jpg
    9.2 KB · Views: 202
  • convnuke.jpg
    convnuke.jpg
    13.3 KB · Views: 189
  • ConvairNX-2.jpg
    ConvairNX-2.jpg
    35.1 KB · Views: 191
  • 8e38534f1caa4c72dc7acb0069eb437c.jpg
    8e38534f1caa4c72dc7acb0069eb437c.jpg
    22.2 KB · Views: 200
  • WS125A.jpg
    WS125A.jpg
    39 KB · Views: 193
  • image020.jpg
    image020.jpg
    9.4 KB · Views: 194
Another source
"Proposed projects
In 1955 , two teams were formed, with the task of furthering the study of the new bomber. These were formed by Convair and General Electric , and Lockheed and Pratt & Whitney . Subsequently, a project was presented also by Douglas .

In general, these were projects with very innovative ways. Lockheed opted for a radically new project, while the Convair decided to start from an existing model, or at least under development (special consideration were the projects of the Convair B-58 and ' XB-70 ). However, all aircraft should have been driven by a variable number of turbojets .

Characteristics
Convair Douglas Lockheed
Length (m) 51,91 48,92 48,92
Wingspan (m) 40,89 50,09 50,09
Height (m) 13,13 / 15,54 15,54 15,54
Wing area ( m² ) 464.5 464.5 464.5
Propulsion 6 x J-75/4 x XMA-1A 2 x J-75/2 x X211(?) 4 x XMA-1C
(Exhuast nozzle is 8!! ;D) (X211 is the name of turbo machinary. ;D) (Exhuast nozzle is 8!! ;D)


What is Douglas proposal?
Powered by 2 x J-75 and 2 x XNJ140E?
 
Hi! Is this a Douglas WS-125A proposal?

"Douglas Model 26 ‘Atomic Bomber’
A wooden, in-house Douglas model of a proposed nuclear powered bomber for the USAF. The layout was clearly designed to keep the crew as far away from the engines as possible! It was possibly a contemporary of the Convair NX-2 project, proposed in response to requirement WS-125A, dated 1954. The Aircraft Nuclear Propulsion programme was abandoned in 1961, so the model probably dates from the mid/late ‘50s."

I can't see additional two J-75 engines. ;D

Sir George Cox collection

I remember that I used to see this aircraft somewhere in this forum.
 

Attachments

  • Douglas_Atomic_Bomber.jpg
    Douglas_Atomic_Bomber.jpg
    80.6 KB · Views: 174
  • collectionsml.jpg
    collectionsml.jpg
    16.6 KB · Views: 640

Attachments

  • P7Mnuclearseamasteronarmamentship.jpg
    P7Mnuclearseamasteronarmamentship.jpg
    118.4 KB · Views: 177
  • P7Mnuclearseamasterandcatamaranseabase.jpg
    P7Mnuclearseamasterandcatamaranseabase.jpg
    313.4 KB · Views: 183
  • P7Mnuclearpoweredseamaster.jpg
    P7Mnuclearpoweredseamaster.jpg
    116.6 KB · Views: 180
  • P7Mnuclearpoweredseamasterart.jpg
    P7Mnuclearpoweredseamasterart.jpg
    126.7 KB · Views: 187
Hi!
Convair blueprint for the nuclear-powered Princess. Photo via Scott Lowther


"So when the U.S. Navy approached Convair with a really weird idea, the San Diego aircraft maker responded with alacrity. If the Princess flying boats were brought to America, asked the Navy, could Convair convert them to nuclear power? Yes, said the company, and drew up blueprints for the modifications. Like the Convair Crusader, the nuclear Princess would be a testbed for atomic-powered flight and crew shielding.All that room prepared for Imperial dignitaries and posh travellers would accommodate a Pratt & Whitney liquid-metal-cooled reactor, a heat exchanger and some serious plumbing to run superheated (radioactive) air into special P&W gas turbines; the “hot” gas would replace gas heated by jet fuel once the big plane reached cruising altitude.

Four turboprop engines would get the seaplane airborne while two nuclear turboprop engines(Nuclear-chemical P&W T57 turboprop engine) would take over during cruise. The great weight of the nuclear power system played to the flying boat’s strength — it’s easier to float great weights than land them on runways. The Air Force’s planned nuclear bomber would have required a 3-mile long runway, as long as the Space Shuttle’s."

Nuclear princess picture.
Model picture.

If an atomic airplane falls, it'll be a catastrophe. The crews rescue will be very difficult. A resident around the fall spot has to take refuge for an extended period, too.
 

Attachments

  • 1_5v03Ms_zV0I5xRNmUThLkw.jpg
    1_5v03Ms_zV0I5xRNmUThLkw.jpg
    132.3 KB · Views: 194
blackkite said:
Hi! Is this a Douglas WS-125A proposal?

"Douglas Model 26 ‘Atomic Bomber’
A wooden, in-house Douglas model of a proposed nuclear powered bomber for the USAF. The layout was clearly designed to keep the crew as far away from the engines as possible! It was possibly a contemporary of the Convair NX-2 project, proposed in response to requirement WS-125A, dated 1954. The Aircraft Nuclear Propulsion programme was abandoned in 1961, so the model probably dates from the mid/late ‘50s."

Unfortunately, no. The model appears to have been modified at some time from the "Hughes Interceptor" concept shown below. Mention of GEN Laurence Kuter as CINC NORAD in the caption would date the photo as having been released between 1958 and 1961.
 

Attachments

  • Hughes Interceptor.jpg
    Hughes Interceptor.jpg
    195.8 KB · Views: 164
  • Hughes Interceptor cutline.jpg
    Hughes Interceptor cutline.jpg
    150.7 KB · Views: 154

Attachments

  • Nuclear_powered_XC-99_plan_view.jpg
    Nuclear_powered_XC-99_plan_view.jpg
    57.7 KB · Views: 706
  • Nuclear_powered_XC-99_front_and_side_view.jpg
    Nuclear_powered_XC-99_front_and_side_view.jpg
    56.3 KB · Views: 712
  • Nuclear powered XC-99.jpg
    Nuclear powered XC-99.jpg
    181.9 KB · Views: 742
Super!! I lost it.
And Nuclear Navy sea plane powered by CCR(compact-core reactor) which proposed by the Nuclear Development Corporation.
This nuclear reactor had solid fuel which cooled by liquid metal.

Also modified AC-110 (perhaps direct cycle)power plant and AC-107 power plant installation was studied.(AC means air cooled reactor?)
 

Attachments

  • AC-107_INSTALLATION.jpg
    AC-107_INSTALLATION.jpg
    73.6 KB · Views: 138
  • Modified_AC-110_POWER_PLANT.jpg
    Modified_AC-110_POWER_PLANT.jpg
    112.1 KB · Views: 126
  • Modified AC-110_POWER_PLANT_INSTALLATION.jpg
    Modified AC-110_POWER_PLANT_INSTALLATION.jpg
    51.2 KB · Views: 129
  • CCR_POWER_PLANT_INSTALLATION.jpg
    CCR_POWER_PLANT_INSTALLATION.jpg
    59 KB · Views: 136
  • CCR_POWER_PLANT_ARRANGEMENT.jpg
    CCR_POWER_PLANT_ARRANGEMENT.jpg
    59.6 KB · Views: 655
  • Navy_Nuclear_Seaplane.jpg
    Navy_Nuclear_Seaplane.jpg
    175.6 KB · Views: 683
Hi! Nuclear powered Princess study.
 

Attachments

  • Nuclear_princess.jpg
    Nuclear_princess.jpg
    142.9 KB · Views: 125
  • power_plant.jpg
    power_plant.jpg
    89.2 KB · Views: 115
  • T-57_engine.jpg
    T-57_engine.jpg
    73.6 KB · Views: 129
  • T-57 system configulation.jpg
    T-57 system configulation.jpg
    95.5 KB · Views: 130
  • P302A system configulation.jpg
    P302A system configulation.jpg
    117.8 KB · Views: 151
Hi! B-52G XNJ140E-1 nuclear turbojet engine test bed and nuclear powered supersonic aircraft design.
XNJ140E-1 engine is very large or this picture shows LF-2 engine?

XNJ140 was a nuclear engine with single X211 turbo machinary.
Each X211 air intake diameter : 1.4m.
J-57's diameter is abut 1m.
 

Attachments

  • Supersonic_nuclear_powered _aircraft.jpg
    Supersonic_nuclear_powered _aircraft.jpg
    42.2 KB · Views: 164
  • General_arrangement_0f_B-52_with_XNJ140E-1_nuclear_engine.jpg
    General_arrangement_0f_B-52_with_XNJ140E-1_nuclear_engine.jpg
    105.5 KB · Views: 177
  • B-52G_flying_test_bed_for_XNJ140_nuclear_turbojet_engine..jpg
    B-52G_flying_test_bed_for_XNJ140_nuclear_turbojet_engine..jpg
    68.9 KB · Views: 166
GE also investigated liquid-circulating-fuel nuclear reactor called LF-1 to LF-6. I think that LF means liquid fuel.
Intermediate heat transfer liquid of this reactor is NaK. Engine intake air was heated by Nak/air heat exchanger.
This report said that Nak has fire hazard.
 

Attachments

  • LF POWER PLANT SPECIFICATION.jpg
    LF POWER PLANT SPECIFICATION.jpg
    227.1 KB · Views: 114
  • compariso of LF and AC reactor.jpg
    compariso of LF and AC reactor.jpg
    131 KB · Views: 97
  • LF_reactor.jpg
    LF_reactor.jpg
    169.5 KB · Views: 105
  • J-73 engine.jpg
    J-73 engine.jpg
    48.2 KB · Views: 109
  • LF SHIELD.jpg
    LF SHIELD.jpg
    89 KB · Views: 105
  • LF flow sheet.jpg
    LF flow sheet.jpg
    80.9 KB · Views: 123
  • LF-2 NUCLEAR JET ENGINE.jpg
    LF-2 NUCLEAR JET ENGINE.jpg
    28.8 KB · Views: 125
  • LF-2 engine.jpg
    LF-2 engine.jpg
    65.7 KB · Views: 119
Hi! XB-70 nuclear engine capability.
 

Attachments

  • XB-70_nuclear_engine_capability.jpg
    XB-70_nuclear_engine_capability.jpg
    235.3 KB · Views: 120
blackkite said:
I find this aircraft as Douglas Model 26 Atomic Bomber in Tony Buttler AMERICAN SECRET PROJECTS BOMBERS, ATTACK AND ANTI-SUBMARINE AIRCRAFT 1945 TO 1974, page 94.
He said that "It carries a Tactical Air Command crest on its fin". He also told about Hughes mach 3 interceptor.

And Lockheed nuclear bomber study is here.
 
Hi! Early nuclear powered aircraft concept from "Popular Science In October,1951".
The frist picture shows indirect nuclear reactor system. Primary coolant is liquid metal and secondary coolant is water. This system is same as Liquid metal cooling fast breeder reactor(LMFBR). But generally LMFRB has intermediate cooling system to protect reactor from sodium/water reaction which occured in sodium/water heat exchanger(Steram Generator) by heat transfer tube water leak.
The second picture shows also indirect nuclear reactor system. Coolant is water. This system is same as Boiling water reactor(BWR).
Perhaps the cooling water is maintained at about 75 atm (7.6 MPa, 1000–1100 psi) so that it boils in the core at about 285 °C (550 °F) same as BWR), and became heavy weight system.

 

Attachments

  • Early unclear flying wing concept.jpg
    Early unclear flying wing concept.jpg
    313.4 KB · Views: 156
  • Early nuclear aircraft concept.jpg
    Early nuclear aircraft concept.jpg
    254.9 KB · Views: 131
blackkite said:
Hi! Early nuclear powered aircraft concept from "Popular Science In October,1951".
The frist picture shows indirect nuclear reactor system. Primary coolant is liquid metal and secondary coolant is water. This system is same as Liquid metal cooling fast breeder reactor(LMFBR). But generally LMFRB has intermediate cooling system to protect reactor from sodium/water reaction which occured in sodium/water heat exchanger(Steram Generator) by heat transfer tube water leak.
The second picture shows also indirect nuclear reactor system. Coolant is water. This system is same as Boiling water reactor(BWR).
Perhaps the cooling water is maintained at about 75 atm (7.6 MPa, 1000–1100 psi) so that it boils in the core at about 285 °C (550 °F) same as BWR), and became heavy weight system.

https://books.google.co.jp/books?id=OSEDAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA98&dq=popular+science+1951+atomic+aircraft&hl=en&ei=dgzFTP-MF8innQeCs-T4CQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=true

Please,don't repeat what I sent before,

look to reply # 159,you will find the same pictures ?.
 
Oh I missed it. But it happened sometime in this forum. I think it Inevitable nevertheless to avoid. ;)
 
blackkite said:
Oh I missed it. But it happened sometime in this forum. I think it Inevitable nevertheless to avoid. ;)

Yes,but you must check from previous pages at first.
 

Attachments

  • s-l1600f.jpg
    s-l1600f.jpg
    120.3 KB · Views: 290
  • s-l1600e.jpg
    s-l1600e.jpg
    117.7 KB · Views: 789
  • s-l1600d.jpg
    s-l1600d.jpg
    116.7 KB · Views: 809
  • s-l1600c.jpg
    s-l1600c.jpg
    103.1 KB · Views: 822
  • s-l1600b.jpg
    s-l1600b.jpg
    100.8 KB · Views: 835
  • s-l1600a.jpg
    s-l1600a.jpg
    99.8 KB · Views: 840
Re: Convair USN Nuclear A/C Review

I am reliably informed that another SPF member has placed the first bid.
 
Re: Convair USN Nuclear A/C Review

That submersible nuclear ramjet is like SLAM taken to the next level. :eek:
 
Re: Convair USN Nuclear A/C Review

sferrin said:
That submersible nuclear ramjet is like SLAM taken to the next level. :eek:

Yeah, that was everything awesome about the 1950's in one crazypants idea. Then came the 1960s with it's horizon-contraction... sigh...
 
Re: Convair USN Nuclear A/C Review

Great find RAP.
 
Re: Convair USN Nuclear A/C Review

Orionblamblam said:
sferrin said:
That submersible nuclear ramjet is like SLAM taken to the next level. :eek:

Yeah, that was everything awesome about the 1950's in one crazypants idea. Then came the 1960s with it's horizon-contraction... sigh...

:(
 
hesham said:
Hi,

http://www.enertipp.ch/index.aspx?z=1&id=191

http://www.avia-it.com/act/biblioteca/periodici/PDF%20Riviste/Ala%20d'Italia/L'ALA%20D'ITALIA%201954%20012.pdf
 

Attachments

  • 2.png
    2.png
    862.4 KB · Views: 283
British idea for a NPA.
Original article appeared in Flying Review early to mid fifties of the former century..
 
lark said:
British idea for a NPA.
Original article appeared in Flying Review early to mid fifties of the former century..

Thank you for the Info my dear Lark.
 
Hi! Tu-119 model.
Another image.
 

Attachments

  • Tu-119.jpg
    Tu-119.jpg
    154.1 KB · Views: 257
lark said:
British idea for a NPA.
Original article appeared in Flying Review early to mid fifties of the former century..

Which one (FR) or which issue my dear Lark.
 
Previously posted by Hesham but caption attached.
 

Attachments

  • Lockheed nuke ac transport.jpg
    Lockheed nuke ac transport.jpg
    69.6 KB · Views: 228
Boeing 747 nuclear test-bed 1975
(D180-18783-1)

Aircraft nuclear propulsion system having an alternative power source / General Electric / 1967 / Kappus

Aircraft nuclear propulsion system
General Electric / 1967 / Kappus

Nuclear powered drone / Grumman / 1986
 
RAP said:
Previously posted by Hesham but caption attached.

Just seen it,thank you RAP;

and here is a Convair two known designs,but more clear.
 

Attachments

  • N-1.png
    N-1.png
    170.4 KB · Views: 1,240
  • N-2.png
    N-2.png
    174.7 KB · Views: 1,247

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom