Register here

Author Topic: Convair XAB-1 atomic powered bomber  (Read 22529 times)

Offline hesham

  • Senior Member
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • **
  • Posts: 22025

Offline XP67_Moonbat

  • Senior Member
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • **
  • Posts: 2151
Re: Convair XAB-1 atomic powered bomber
« Reply #1 on: September 29, 2009, 11:51:11 am »
Nice! Hesh, buddy! Buy it for me, yeah?  :P
In God we trust, all others we monitor. :-p

Offline Merv_P

  • CLEARANCE: Confidential
  • *
  • Posts: 115
Re: Convair XAB-1 atomic powered bomber
« Reply #2 on: September 29, 2009, 04:34:43 pm »
Unfortunately;

"This product is no longer available for purchase."  >:(

This vendor used to have a lot more what-if related items for sale, but there are still a couple available if Hesham's feeling generous...

http://market.renderosity.com/mod/bcs/index.php?vendor=duo




Offline Orionblamblam

  • Secret Projects Guru
  • Top Contributor
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • ***
  • Posts: 7076
    • Aerospace Projects Review
Re: Convair XAB-1 atomic powered bomber
« Reply #3 on: September 29, 2009, 06:52:48 pm »
Meh.




Now existing in the real world:
Aerospace Projects Review


And so the endless circle of life comes to an end, meaningless and grim. Why did they live, and why did they die? No reason. Two hundred million years of evolution snuffed out, for in the end Nature is horrific and teaches us nothing

Offline XP67_Moonbat

  • Senior Member
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • **
  • Posts: 2151
Re: Convair XAB-1 atomic powered bomber
« Reply #4 on: September 29, 2009, 07:53:08 pm »
I'll buy that for a dollar!
In God we trust, all others we monitor. :-p

Offline The Artist

  • Senior Member
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • **
  • Posts: 520
Re: Convair XAB-1 atomic powered bomber
« Reply #5 on: November 04, 2009, 08:14:11 pm »
There was an old Hawk kit of this design. In this case the word 'was' is a good thing because Hawk is back in production and they seem to be working their way through reissuing the old kits. There is hope for seeing this little beauty on the hobby shop shelves again.

Mike
"Thank you for summing that up."

Hiccup Horrendous Haddock III

Offline elmayerle

  • Aerospace Engineer
  • Senior Member
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • **
  • Posts: 1204
Re: Convair XAB-1 atomic powered bomber
« Reply #6 on: November 04, 2009, 08:19:05 pm »
There was an old Hawk kit of this design. In this case the word 'was' is a good thing because Hawk is back in production and they seem to be working their way through reissuing the old kits. There is hope for seeing this little beauty on the hobby shop shelves again.

Yes, the old Hawk "Beta One".  One of the first kits I ever built, way back when.  I most certainly hope they do bring it back out as I'd really like one.

Offline Tophe

  • Senior Member
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • **
  • Posts: 1151
    • Forked Ghosts
Re: Convair XAB-1 atomic powered bomber
« Reply #7 on: November 22, 2009, 07:58:31 pm »
Amazing... Thanks for this posting, Hesham. ;D

Offline Orionblamblam

  • Secret Projects Guru
  • Top Contributor
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • ***
  • Posts: 7076
    • Aerospace Projects Review
Re: Convair XAB-1 atomic powered bomber
« Reply #8 on: November 22, 2009, 08:50:36 pm »
I most certainly hope they do bring it back out as I'd really like one.

I've got the physical master parts on a table being cleaned up and detailed at this very moment.
Aerospace Projects Review


And so the endless circle of life comes to an end, meaningless and grim. Why did they live, and why did they die? No reason. Two hundred million years of evolution snuffed out, for in the end Nature is horrific and teaches us nothing

Offline Skyblazer

  • Global Moderator
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • ****
  • Posts: 13244
Re: Convair XAB-1 atomic powered bomber
« Reply #9 on: November 23, 2009, 03:14:54 am »
Was that a Convair design for sure, anyway? The box doesn't give any manufacturer's name. Has anyone got a Convair-originating sketch or three-view that would validate this allocation?

Offline Matej

  • Deputy Administrator
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • ****
  • Posts: 2617
  • Multiuniversal creator
    • Hitechweb - bizare aviation
Re: Convair XAB-1 atomic powered bomber
« Reply #10 on: November 23, 2009, 03:38:44 am »
Was that a real design anyway? I was under impression, that this is mostly what-if model, not the real thing.

Bizarre aviation expert.

Offline hesham

  • Senior Member
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • **
  • Posts: 22025

Offline The Artist

  • Senior Member
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • **
  • Posts: 520
Re: Convair XAB-1 atomic powered bomber
« Reply #12 on: November 23, 2009, 07:40:25 pm »
Was that a Convair design for sure, anyway? The box doesn't give any manufacturer's name. Has anyone got a Convair-originating sketch or three-view that would validate this allocation?

Here is the opening paragraph in the instructions for the old Hawk plastic kit - Hawk Atomic Airplane, XAB-1 BETA 1.

"Incorporated in the design of the Beta 1 are the engineering criteria established for an atomic airplane. The design, although hypothetical, is completely within the realm of possibility. In no way does Hawk Model Company intend to inply that such an airplane exists or is on the drawing boards. However, what is presented here has been checked by one of the United States' leading aircraft companies and has been declared entirely sound and possible. Therefore, this airplane could exist."

One thing bothers me about this design as implied in the instructions. According to Hawk, the bomber would have taken off and landed with the parasite fighters in place on the tail. Wouldn't there be a risk of the fighter noses buckling under the stress of the landing impact?

Mike

Note. Edited because I'm still learning the features here.
« Last Edit: November 23, 2009, 08:20:45 pm by The Artist »
"Thank you for summing that up."

Hiccup Horrendous Haddock III

Offline Orionblamblam

  • Secret Projects Guru
  • Top Contributor
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • ***
  • Posts: 7076
    • Aerospace Projects Review
Re: Convair XAB-1 atomic powered bomber
« Reply #13 on: November 23, 2009, 09:32:07 pm »

One thing bothers me about this design as implied in the instructions. According to Hawk, the bomber would have taken off and landed with the parasite fighters in place on the tail. Wouldn't there be a risk of the fighter noses buckling under the stress of the landing impact?


You betcha. Also of concern is the fact that the atomic engines are the ones on the wingtips, not the ones in the fuselage. This would not only put extreme masses way out on the wingtips (meanign structural problems for the wings), this would also fail to utilize the structure of the aircraft as sheilding... instead there is a straight shot for the radiation from the reactors to the crew.

Still, it's a neato design, aesthetically.
Aerospace Projects Review


And so the endless circle of life comes to an end, meaningless and grim. Why did they live, and why did they die? No reason. Two hundred million years of evolution snuffed out, for in the end Nature is horrific and teaches us nothing

Offline Michel Van

  • Senior Member
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • **
  • Posts: 4055
Re: Convair XAB-1 atomic powered bomber
« Reply #14 on: November 24, 2009, 03:23:07 am »

One thing bothers me about this design as implied in the instructions. According to Hawk, the bomber would have taken off and landed with the parasite fighters in place on the tail. Wouldn't there be a risk of the fighter noses buckling under the stress of the landing impact?


You betcha. Also of concern is the fact that the atomic engines are the ones on the wingtips, not the ones in the fuselage. This would not only put extreme masses way out on the wingtips (meanign structural problems for the wings), this would also fail to utilize the structure of the aircraft as sheilding... instead there is a straight shot for the radiation from the reactors to the crew.

Still, it's a neato design, aesthetically.

is more logical that Bomber takeoff without the parasite fighters
then the parasite fighters takeoff and dock with Bomber after reactors check

the radiation shielding on this Bomber is a nightmare
do that Reactors are in the wingtips, there can't be a heavy shielding.
I guess that Reactors are only Partially shield and rest
take fuselage and wings as Shadow shield

but i demand how much radiation will reach to the Fighters pilots....
I love Strange Technology

Offline Skyraider3D

  • Senior Member
  • CLEARANCE: Secret
  • **
  • Posts: 365
  • Aviation Artist
    • Skyraider's 3D Aviation Art
Re: Convair XAB-1 atomic powered bomber
« Reply #15 on: November 28, 2009, 04:00:17 am »
That's a very cool kit of a totally ridiculous concept!  :D  Wicked!

www. A V I A T I O N A R T .aero
Please find my latest works on Facebook!

Offline Steve Pace

  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • ***
  • Posts: 2269
  • Aviation History Writer
Re: Convair XAB-1 atomic powered bomber
« Reply #16 on: November 28, 2009, 07:40:45 am »
The fighter pilots would be "jailed" in their aircraft throughout the long endurance missions - unacceptable. Not to mention the large amounts of "wash" created by the hugh bomber during docking and undocking maneuvers...
When you know you're right, go ahead.

Offline The Artist

  • Senior Member
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • **
  • Posts: 520
Re: Convair XAB-1 atomic powered bomber
« Reply #17 on: December 09, 2009, 07:51:42 pm »
Was that a Convair design for sure, anyway? The box doesn't give any manufacturer's name. Has anyone got a Convair-originating sketch or three-view that would validate this allocation?


I figured I'd post this here to give some contrast with a pair of designs that have been attributed to Convair.

Mike
"Thank you for summing that up."

Hiccup Horrendous Haddock III

Offline Skyblazer

  • Global Moderator
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • ****
  • Posts: 13244
Re: Convair XAB-1 atomic powered bomber
« Reply #18 on: December 10, 2009, 01:05:39 am »
Thanks. Yeah, I know these, they're from the NX-2 nuclear bomber program. One of these was also credited as a Lockheed proposal in some sources, though I think both were indeed Convair variants of the same basic configuration.

Offline The Artist

  • Senior Member
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • **
  • Posts: 520
Re: Convair XAB-1 atomic powered bomber
« Reply #19 on: December 13, 2009, 07:40:10 pm »
This thread inspired me to build my old Hawk kit of the Beta-1 then use it to do this painting. That being the case, this thread seems to be the best place to show it.

I've reached a point on this one where I have to leave it alone for a while then see what still needs to be done. I figured I'd let everyone here take a look.

Note. I'm trying to make a better image of this (the blues are a bit too strong) and I'll replace this one when I do.

So now. Go at it. let me know what I've done wrong.

Mike
"Thank you for summing that up."

Hiccup Horrendous Haddock III

Offline Orionblamblam

  • Secret Projects Guru
  • Top Contributor
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • ***
  • Posts: 7076
    • Aerospace Projects Review
Re: Convair XAB-1 atomic powered bomber
« Reply #20 on: December 13, 2009, 07:50:51 pm »

So now. Go at it. let me know what I've done wrong.

About the only thing I can see "wrong" is that the fighter pilots appear to be seated. Since I'm still working on the physical parts - doing the detailing by hand - I can assure you that no pilot larger than Minime could have sat in the thing. The pilots would have had to be prone.
Aerospace Projects Review


And so the endless circle of life comes to an end, meaningless and grim. Why did they live, and why did they die? No reason. Two hundred million years of evolution snuffed out, for in the end Nature is horrific and teaches us nothing

Offline The Artist

  • Senior Member
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • **
  • Posts: 520
Re: Convair XAB-1 atomic powered bomber
« Reply #21 on: December 13, 2009, 08:07:05 pm »


About the only thing I can see "wrong" is that the fighter pilots appear to be seated. Since I'm still working on the physical parts - doing the detailing by hand - I can assure you that no pilot larger than Minime could have sat in the thing. The pilots would have had to be prone.

Thanks for that information. Maybe that explains the extra long canopy on the fighter. I thought the thing was a two-seater at first, but then I noticed only one ejection seat triangle in the decal instructions. To be honest, I didn't bother checking the scale since I'm convinced that it is a fictional design.

Mike
"Thank you for summing that up."

Hiccup Horrendous Haddock III

Offline Orionblamblam

  • Secret Projects Guru
  • Top Contributor
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • ***
  • Posts: 7076
    • Aerospace Projects Review
Re: Convair XAB-1 atomic powered bomber
« Reply #22 on: December 13, 2009, 08:12:22 pm »
To be honest, I didn't bother checking the scale since I'm convinced that it is a fictional design.

I don't think a whole lot of thought went into the details when Hawk was designing this thing fifty years ago. Hell, I'm asonished that they even determined a scale for it (1/188). Typically "sized so it fits in a box" would be about as far as they'd go when it came to fictional designs.
Aerospace Projects Review


And so the endless circle of life comes to an end, meaningless and grim. Why did they live, and why did they die? No reason. Two hundred million years of evolution snuffed out, for in the end Nature is horrific and teaches us nothing

Offline SaturnCanuck

  • CLEARANCE: Secret
  • **
  • Posts: 299
  • Any landing you can walk away from, is a good one.
    • AeroFile Publications
Re: Convair XAB-1 atomic powered bomber
« Reply #23 on: December 21, 2009, 08:42:46 am »
On a slightly related topic, does anyone remember the Aurora kits they put out in the 1970s of SF TV and movie spacecraft?  This included the Orion from 2001 and the Flying Sub, et al.  Anyway, one in the series was for a "fictional" USAF spacecraft called the Rajnorok.  It had a little parasite fighter that was docked out of the tail.

Over time, all I have left is the little fighter, shown here....
Saturncanuck

:)

Offline frank

  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • ***
  • Posts: 618
Re: Convair XAB-1 atomic powered bomber
« Reply #24 on: December 21, 2009, 01:45:44 pm »

     Yeah, the Ragnorok Orbital Interceptor, IIRC. It had been the Russian Nuclear Powered Bomber, IIRC, in its previous life. I don't know if it had a fighter in that guise, tho.


On a slightly related topic, does anyone remember the Aurora kits they put out in the 1970s of SF TV and movie spacecraft?  This included the Orion from 2001 and the Flying Sub, et al.  Anyway, one in the series was for a "fictional" USAF spacecraft called the Rajnorok.  It had a little parasite fighter that was docked out of the tail.

Over time, all I have left is the little fighter, shown here....

Offline SaturnCanuck

  • CLEARANCE: Secret
  • **
  • Posts: 299
  • Any landing you can walk away from, is a good one.
    • AeroFile Publications
Re: Convair XAB-1 atomic powered bomber
« Reply #25 on: December 21, 2009, 04:19:45 pm »

     Yeah, the Ragnorok Orbital Interceptor, IIRC. It had been the Russian Nuclear Powered Bomber, IIRC, in its previous life. I don't know if it had a fighter in that guise, tho.


On a slightly related topic, does anyone remember the Aurora kits they put out in the 1970s of SF TV and movie spacecraft?  This included the Orion from 2001 and the Flying Sub, et al.  Anyway, one in the series was for a "fictional" USAF spacecraft called the Rajnorok.  It had a little parasite fighter that was docked out of the tail.

Over time, all I have left is the little fighter, shown here....

What did IIRC stand for?
Saturncanuck

:)

Offline SaturnCanuck

  • CLEARANCE: Secret
  • **
  • Posts: 299
  • Any landing you can walk away from, is a good one.
    • AeroFile Publications
Re: Convair XAB-1 atomic powered bomber
« Reply #26 on: December 21, 2009, 04:24:12 pm »
Thanks to "frank"s remembering of the name, I found it.

Here it is in all her glory...

http://www.fantastic-plastic.com/RAGNOROCK%20INTERCEPTOR%20PAGE.htm
Saturncanuck

:)

Offline Orionblamblam

  • Secret Projects Guru
  • Top Contributor
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • ***
  • Posts: 7076
    • Aerospace Projects Review
Re: Convair XAB-1 atomic powered bomber
« Reply #27 on: December 21, 2009, 04:32:42 pm »

     Yeah, the Ragnorok Orbital Interceptor, IIRC.

What did IIRC stand for?


"If I Recall Correctly."
Aerospace Projects Review


And so the endless circle of life comes to an end, meaningless and grim. Why did they live, and why did they die? No reason. Two hundred million years of evolution snuffed out, for in the end Nature is horrific and teaches us nothing

Offline SaturnCanuck

  • CLEARANCE: Secret
  • **
  • Posts: 299
  • Any landing you can walk away from, is a good one.
    • AeroFile Publications
Re: Convair XAB-1 atomic powered bomber
« Reply #28 on: December 21, 2009, 04:59:02 pm »
Giggles....

I thought it was part of the designation......
Saturncanuck

:)

Offline shockonlip

  • Senior Member
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • **
  • Posts: 605
Re: Convair XAB-1 atomic powered bomber
« Reply #29 on: December 21, 2009, 06:06:22 pm »

I still have one of each of all these boxed somewhere.

I really enjoyed building these things back then and got a real rush
about thinking about them and the technology they were based
on. It actually caused me to read up on this technology, so for me
it was very educational.

I wonder if the late John Andrews ever worked on the Hawk Atomic
Bomber, because I think he did a stint at Hawk.

He believed in designing models that were educational as well. I had
several discussions on this with him.

I recalled when he called me at Intel one day, in an official capacity
(for a change) and asked me about the feasibility of a model of a
microprocessor chip. We discussed it conceptually for some time.
Testors decided not to do anything with that, and I would not be the
proper one at Intel to finally approach on this, but that was the kind
of creative talent that he had.

As I read some AIAA papers on advanced aircraft concepts, I really
wish there was a modelling company that would take some of these
advanced designs and do something similar !

Can you imaging a model of Leik Myrabo's Mach 50 lightcraft, perhaps
with an associated model of the laser launcher, with suitable and
fascinating concept art. Explaining the whole concept, with suitable
additional references.

Or a model of say a very advanced detonation wave ramjet of the
future that would work beyond where scramjets can go.

Or an undersea aircraft carrier, like in G Harry Stine's "Starsea Invaders"
trilogy (I also enjoyed those books and they started me going too).

Anyway, great thought provoking and creative enjoyment!

Offline Ju388

  • CLEARANCE: Restricted
  • Posts: 13
Re: Convair XAB-1 atomic powered bomber
« Reply #30 on: March 29, 2010, 09:31:23 pm »

So now. Go at it. let me know what I've done wrong.

Mike

   Well the one thing that is wrong, I have not received my suitable for framing lithograph yet.
          
                  "let me know what I have done wrong"...........  Your kidding right?
                   I'm serious,I want a copy of this in a frame on my wall. In my untrained eye it's perfect.
                   My Grandfather owned a hobbyshop in 60's and early 70's and I have built the Beta three times.
                   I have been a member of this message board maybe a week. And have had my eyes bug out so many times.
                   Don't get much better than this.
        
« Last Edit: March 30, 2010, 11:44:05 pm by Ju388 »

Offline Jemiba

  • Global Moderator
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • ****
  • Posts: 7871
Re: Convair XAB-1 atomic powered bomber
« Reply #31 on: March 30, 2010, 03:31:04 am »
"The pilots would have had to be prone"

Ouch !  If actually built, the designer of this thing probably would have been under constant
fear of being killed  ... by those "happy" pilots, lying there for hours on their belly and trying to
get at some view ahead, ruining their necks. Wouldn't an inclined position have been a
healthier alternative ?
It takes a long time, before all mistakes are made ...

Offline Skyraider3D

  • Senior Member
  • CLEARANCE: Secret
  • **
  • Posts: 365
  • Aviation Artist
    • Skyraider's 3D Aviation Art
Re: Convair XAB-1 atomic powered bomber
« Reply #32 on: March 30, 2010, 12:03:40 pm »
Hehe, sounds like a UAV variant would be the only pilot-friendly option! :)

www. A V I A T I O N A R T .aero
Please find my latest works on Facebook!

Offline Ju388

  • CLEARANCE: Restricted
  • Posts: 13
Re: Convair XAB-1 atomic powered bomber
« Reply #33 on: March 31, 2010, 02:11:21 am »
  Would it be possible that the parasite fighters would takroff independantly and dock with the Beta1 once airborne? And then land indepentantly at the end of the mission. Would a squadron of these fighters deploy in pairs along a route and relieve the previous pair in rotation? That would negate some of the human factors. Too bad the airframes and the pilots would still be glow in the dark. Another downside would be predeployment of the fighters could be a telltail as to Beta's mission. I think I've read this was a concern with SUNTAN. The appearence of hydrogen fuel handling equipment on a airfield would give away SUNTAN's presence.
  And then we need to explore BETA's other two missions, XAKB-1 and XARB-1 the tanker and the recon platform.
 



Offline ABU625

  • CLEARANCE: Confidential
  • *
  • Posts: 27
Re: Convair XAB-1 atomic powered bomber
« Reply #34 on: May 03, 2010, 07:48:36 am »
Fantastic Plastic's 1:144 XAB-1 kit is now out!

You can find it at www.fantastic-plastic.com.

Offline prolific1

  • Senior Member
  • CLEARANCE: Secret
  • **
  • Posts: 450
    • Aviation Design Boneyard
Re: Convair XAB-1 atomic powered bomber
« Reply #35 on: May 03, 2010, 09:20:46 am »
I suppose I could make a 3-view of that with the appropriate references.
Windows/PCs/anything Microsoft sucks.

Offline Skyblazer

  • Global Moderator
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • ****
  • Posts: 13244
Re: Convair XAB-1 atomic powered bomber
« Reply #36 on: May 03, 2010, 10:11:27 am »
I suppose I could make a 3-view of that with the appropriate references.

Sure. Except it's probably 100% fiction, not based on any actual design from Convair...

Offline prolific1

  • Senior Member
  • CLEARANCE: Secret
  • **
  • Posts: 450
    • Aviation Design Boneyard
Re: Convair XAB-1 atomic powered bomber
« Reply #37 on: May 03, 2010, 10:59:09 am »
In that case I'll pass. Any legit nuclear programs are fair game however.
Windows/PCs/anything Microsoft sucks.

Offline frank

  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • ***
  • Posts: 618
Re: Convair XAB-1 atomic powered bomber
« Reply #38 on: May 11, 2010, 03:27:42 pm »

      I think the old Hawk kit had a 3-view in the instructions.

I suppose I could make a 3-view of that with the appropriate references.

Sure. Except it's probably 100% fiction, not based on any actual design from Convair...

Offline tab28682

  • CLEARANCE: Restricted
  • Posts: 13
Re: Convair XAB-1 atomic powered bomber
« Reply #39 on: November 07, 2018, 01:41:35 pm »
I have always really liked this fantasy aircraft and built several of the Hawk models in my youth.

With an eye towards doing a full bodied RC model of the XAB-1, I developed a simple profile foam model of the XAB-1 to use as an RC testbed for CG location and and controlability and such. Power is by a small pusher electric motor, with the option to also use a long burn low thrust rocket motor as well.

Finally got around to trying it and it might be the first ever RC XAB-1 to fly, even if it was quite simplistic...:)

Flies very nicely with no vices. I confess to enlarging the vertical tail area using the TLAR method to help keep the pointy end forward at all times.

The first electric pusher flights were made without the parasites in place.
« Last Edit: November 07, 2018, 01:44:25 pm by tab28682 »

Offline hesham

  • Senior Member
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • **
  • Posts: 22025
Re: Convair XAB-1 atomic powered bomber
« Reply #40 on: November 08, 2018, 04:04:16 am »
I have always really liked this fantasy aircraft and built several of the Hawk models in my youth.

With an eye towards doing a full bodied RC model of the XAB-1, I developed a simple profile foam model of the XAB-1 to use as an RC testbed for CG location and and controlability and such. Power is by a small pusher electric motor, with the option to also use a long burn low thrust rocket motor as well.

Finally got around to trying it and it might be the first ever RC XAB-1 to fly, even if it was quite simplistic...:)

Flies very nicely with no vices. I confess to enlarging the vertical tail area using the TLAR method to help keep the pointy end forward at all times.

The first electric pusher flights were made without the parasites in place.

WOW,amazing Model.