US Lifting Bodies Studies - START (ASSET/PRIME), FDL, X-24, etc.

RanulfC said:
Sure having your intakes on the upper surface actually costs you some perfomance, (and makes rapid changes of AOA a stone-..er.. bear ;) ) but this isn't actually (from what I've been reading on the subject in various places) as critical for a hypersonic cruise vehicle. Manned or unmanned.

Am I crazy? (Ok, any more than NORMAL maybe... ;) )

Randy

No, this is not crazy. I have seen some serious work done on "dorsal" inlets for hypersonic cruise aircraft, but not accelerators.
 
Hi Randy,

The FDL-5 and other low lift-to-drag ratio hypersonic reentry vehicles like FDL-6, FDL-7, FDL-8, etc, never fly at a nose high attitude. The Space Shuttle have an entry angle of about 40 degrees. The FDL family of hypersonic vehicles were designed to fly with very minimal nose high attitude (way below 40 degrees). The way the Wright Patterson FDL-5 mock up is built (and my resin scale models of it) shows it without its window shrouds. You cannot fly hypersonic speed in the atmosphere with the nose angle at nearly level flight with flat or slightly angles windows at the speeds at which the FDL-5 and X-20 fly. That's why the X-20 had a jettisonable window shroud. The windows would have been visible only in the last moments of the flight (shortly before touch-down), they are used only for visual final approach. In orbit, video cameras and optical periscopes would have been used (by the way, i spotted two small window fairings on a higher resolution picture of the manned FDL-5 mock-up that would correspond to that).
The 64 feet long FDL-5 manned would have flown its mission on instruments, the window shrouds being jettisonned only shortly before landing (and only after completing its reentry). There would not have been anything retractable to cover the windows and the area in front of the windows (way too complicated, heavy and risky). Just a note, i took the artistic license to photograph my resin kit model of the FDL-5 "in space" and without window shrouds simply because the window shrouds have never been shown and because we better know the mock-up in its without-window-shrouds configuration (and admitedly because it looks more interesting that way). For the sake or realism anyone who wants to represent the FDL-5 manned as it would really look like in orbit can always cover the area in front of the windows with plasticard and it will give a good idea of what it would look like with window shrouds in place.

About the dorsal inlets for hypersonic airbreathers, there are not tons of them out there, and the Flying Wind Tunnel was not built. Usually the best place to put your inlets is under the fuselage, with at least 3 ramps to compress the air to the engine modules. Their are several axi-symmetric inlet designs too including some that were flown (Russia, Australia) which use a cone in the inlet for compression. X-43, X-51, X-30, etc, all use ventral inlets with compression ramps. It's interesting to note that even for the Mach 3 plus D-21 drone, the ramjet used to blow-out during turns but would re-ignite during straight flight due to the heat of the engine walls alone (!). A dorsal inlet for a maneuvering hypersonic vehicle might experience more blow-outs than a model with a ventral inlet.

Stephane.
Stratosphere Models



RanulfC said:
flateric said:
http://www.mri.psu.edu/Events/MaterialsDay/2004/kramer.pdf
Old topic a bit but something that caught my eye here was the bottom pic of an "unknownlockheedmissile" which pretty much fits the FDL-5/7 mock-up images and it got me thinking...
I KNOW all the info says the flat surfaces on the mock-up are windows, but something about them always bothered me. Mostly I suspect the "angle" they are at, especially given the overall "nose-high" landing mode always shown for the design. Combined with the ninefingers models model and now this pic it occurs to me: What if they weren't 'windows' but intakes?
Sure having your intakes on the upper surface actually costs you some perfomance, (and makes rapid changes of AOA a stone-..er.. bear ;) ) but this isn't actually (from what I've been reading on the subject in various places) as critical for a hypersonic cruise vehicle. Manned or unmanned.

Am I crazy? (Ok, any more than NORMAL maybe... ;) )

Randy
 
HL-10, one picture shows HL-10 Logistics Vehicle and a launch mock-up.
Link: http://www.flickr.com/photos/sdasmarchives/4589926701/
 
this look like Martin Lifting body (and MOL Mockup ?)
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sdasmarchives/4590546198/sizes/o/in/photostream/
 
Michel Van said:
this look like Martin Lifting body (and MOL Mockup ?)
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sdasmarchives/4590546198/sizes/o/in/photostream/

That is the booster for the lifting body
 
Byeman said:
Michel Van said:
this look like Martin Lifting body (and MOL Mockup ?)
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sdasmarchives/4590546198/sizes/o/in/photostream/

That is the booster for the lifting body

It appears also in the Jenkins' "X-Planes Scrapbook".
 
This looks like the place and time to post this. I've had this photo in my collection since the 80s or early 90s.
 

Attachments

  • From the Cradle of Aviation Museum.jpg
    From the Cradle of Aviation Museum.jpg
    445.4 KB · Views: 487
oh...what a present. thanks!
 
The Artist said:
This looks like the place and time to post this. I've had this photo in my collection since the 80s or early 90s.

Indeed, thanks a lot Artist!
Very interesting 2- (or 3-) place HL-10 type lifting body mock-up.
And only with "US Air Force" markings?
Any other information concerning the background and the actual status of this vehicle?

Thanks in advance,

Philippe
 
The Artist said:
This looks like the place and time to post this. I've had this photo in my collection since the 80s or early 90s.

When you think you've seen it all, there's always something new and amazing to come your way...

I visited the Cradle of Aviation Museum back in 1993 and also some of its workshops (they were rebuilding a Savoia-Marchetti S.56 flying boat) but I never saw that thing. Do they still have it or was it swapped? Scrapped?

Anyway, thanks for sharing!
 
I posted that picture hoping that someone else would know something about it. I'm going to have to dig for what little information I have on the thing. I want to say that Robert McCall referred me to the Cradle of Aviation Museum about that thing. (That was a long time ago) I had seen one of his paintings depicting a vehicle of this design and the caption referred to the vehicle as the Dynasoar. I called him to ask about that designation as I had not seen that shape in any of the Dynasoar images I had seen by then. Anyway. I called the museum and asked about the mock-up Bob had mentioned and they sent the photograph.

Now. The information I'll have to dig for is what little I learned about the thing some time later. While the thing may have been used as a training aid or design tool, it had been used in an exhibit - World's Fair - I believe. I have seen a photo of this, or something like it, hanging with a small space station module and an astronaut in EVA suit. I saw that picture in - I believe - an article about that mock-up being moved from the Cradle of Aviation Museum to its new home in another location. If I find the article I'll post it.
 
Try this on for size! :)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KNWzlw1HNjQ&NR=1

"Rendezvous In Space", a film made for the '64 World's Fair. Not bad as far old cartoons go. Goes dark from 4:38 to 6:57. But at least you still get to see the landing sequence.

It's funny how I noticed the voice talent and sound effects on this one.

I recognize some of the voices from "Looney Tunes" (ironically, the carrot had to be the voice of Bugs Bunny) and the computer sound effects remind me of that whole teleportation bit from the original Chocolate Factory movie.
 
Thank you. Yes. That's the bit I saw about it being moved.

On the illustration page facing page 321 there is a contact sheet of 25 exposures of the thing in the process of being installed in the new location. On the preceding page are three small pictures of the mock-up from the right side. The caption identifies it as "The Martin World's Fair X-23A version in Oklahoma." However. The background in these three shots does not match the surroundings visible in the contact sheet images. I believe these shots were taken in the same location as the photo I posted.

In the color section between pages 128 and 129 is a picture of the display in the 1964 New York World's Fair. The caption is as follows.

The Martin Dyna-Soar on display at the New York World's Fair in 1964. The Shape bears some resemblance to thew Martin X-23A/SV-5D reentry model and appears to be an interim design falling between the X-20 and later lifting bodies such as the X-24, the M2-F2, and the HL-10. This life-size model shown docking with a space station was animated. It ended up at the Oklahoma Omniplex and may be the nearest thing left in existence to a Dyna-Soar.

I guess my memory was wrong about the EVA astronaut as none is visible in the picture. I'll try to scan and post the color image - if posting from this book is permitted - or if anyone else is in a position to do so then go ahead and post it. Meanwhile, I'll keep digging because I think I've got something else on this from a magazine.

Edit - note: this is in response to Barrington Bond's message. The animation was posted while I was composing the message.
 
Here is the World's Fair Exhibit picture from Dyna-Soar: Hypersonic Strategic Weapons System. Additionally, I'm posting a copy of the Robert McCall painting to illustrate my above comment.
 

Attachments

  • 1964 World's Fair Exhibit.jpg
    1964 World's Fair Exhibit.jpg
    313.2 KB · Views: 354
  • The Robert McCall Painting.jpg
    The Robert McCall Painting.jpg
    436.4 KB · Views: 329
Actually it wasn't Dyna Soar, it was a Martin's exhibit. The lifting body was a reduced version of the SLOMAR proposal (MB-2 shape)
 
Skybolt said:
Actually it wasn't Dyna Soar, it was a Martin's exhibit. The lifting body was a reduced version of the SLOMAR proposal (MB-2 shape)

Yes, and I see another problem with that caption from the book. The mock-up should have been said to resemble the HL-10, not the X-23A/SV-5D. (Did he mean to say X-24A?)
 
The Artist said:
Skybolt said:
Actually it wasn't Dyna Soar, it was a Martin's exhibit. The lifting body was a reduced version of the SLOMAR proposal (MB-2 shape)

Yes, and I see another problem with that caption from the book. The mock-up should have been said to resemble the HL-10, not the X-23A/SV-5D. (Did he mean to say X-24A?)

Perhaps some relation with Martin "3/D" proposal detailed in NASA report CR-66358 "Study of the influence of size of a manned lifting body entry vehicle on research potential and cost. Final report; Part VII: Selected Entry Vehicle Design":
http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19700076975_1970076975.pdf

But the Martin's contrat with NASA ref. NAS 1-6209 is dated April 1966, two year after the World Fair, and Martin's final report is dated May 1967.
In the meantime, NASA published a report NASA TM X-1321 on "Effects of various canopies on the aerodynamic characteristics of a manned lifting entry vehicle at Mach O.O6 to 6.8", dated Decembre 1966:
http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19700078696_1970078696.pdf
 

Attachments

  • Martin report 1.jpg
    Martin report 1.jpg
    76.6 KB · Views: 247
  • Martin report 2.jpg
    Martin report 2.jpg
    72.1 KB · Views: 226
  • NASA report 3.jpg
    NASA report 3.jpg
    31 KB · Views: 228
Some classic stuff here
Post-1
From
-Faster than sound -by Bill Gunston
-Air Enthusiast /Eight
-Aviation History -July 1997
-The Eagles Talon INC.
 

Attachments

  • Escanear0004.jpg
    Escanear0004.jpg
    366.9 KB · Views: 114
  • Escanear0003.jpg
    Escanear0003.jpg
    383.9 KB · Views: 114
  • Escanear0002.jpg
    Escanear0002.jpg
    252.5 KB · Views: 174
  • Escanear0001.jpg
    Escanear0001.jpg
    686.6 KB · Views: 184
Some classic stuff here
Post-2
From
-Faster than sound -by Bill Gunston
-Air Enthusiast /Eight
-Aviation History -July 1997
-The Eagles Talon INC.
 

Attachments

  • Escanear0009.jpg
    Escanear0009.jpg
    75.1 KB · Views: 135
  • Escanear0008.jpg
    Escanear0008.jpg
    65.6 KB · Views: 149
  • Escanear0007.jpg
    Escanear0007.jpg
    245.7 KB · Views: 166
  • Escanear0006.jpg
    Escanear0006.jpg
    313.6 KB · Views: 161
  • Escanear0005.jpg
    Escanear0005.jpg
    235.8 KB · Views: 166
Some classic stuff here
Post-3
From
-Airpower -Sept.2003
-Air International-Oct.2001
-Spaceflight-June 1999
-The X-Planes by Jay Miller
 

Attachments

  • Escanear0001.jpg
    Escanear0001.jpg
    691 KB · Views: 112
  • Escanear0002.jpg
    Escanear0002.jpg
    236.3 KB · Views: 166
  • Escanear0003.jpg
    Escanear0003.jpg
    571.8 KB · Views: 165
  • Escanear0004.jpg
    Escanear0004.jpg
    177.6 KB · Views: 143
Some classic stuff here
Post-4
From
-Le Fanatique de l'Aviation
-Unknown source
 

Attachments

  • Escanear0005.jpg
    Escanear0005.jpg
    291.6 KB · Views: 100
  • Escanear0004.jpg
    Escanear0004.jpg
    234.6 KB · Views: 88
  • Escanear0003.jpg
    Escanear0003.jpg
    346.2 KB · Views: 87
  • Escanear0002.jpg
    Escanear0002.jpg
    336.7 KB · Views: 91
  • Escanear0001.jpg
    Escanear0001.jpg
    765.5 KB · Views: 99
Some classic stuff here
Post-5
From
-Le Fanatique de l'Aviation
-Jet & Prop 5/98
-The Eagles Talon INC.
-Airpower-Sept 2003
-Air International-Oct.1996
-Air Enthusiast-Eight
-The Dream Machines-by Ron Miller
-Unknown source
 

Attachments

  • Escanear0005.jpg
    Escanear0005.jpg
    229.8 KB · Views: 85
  • Escanear0004.jpg
    Escanear0004.jpg
    451.2 KB · Views: 86
  • Escanear0003.jpg
    Escanear0003.jpg
    699 KB · Views: 78
  • Escanear0002.jpg
    Escanear0002.jpg
    243.3 KB · Views: 89
  • Escanear0001.jpg
    Escanear0001.jpg
    376 KB · Views: 95
Some classic stuff here
Post-6
From
-Le Fanatique de l'Aviation
-Jet & Prop 5/98
-The Eagles Talon INC.
-Airpower-Sept 2003
-Air International-Oct.1996
-Air Enthusiast-Eight
-The Dream Machines-by Ron Miller
-Unknown source
 

Attachments

  • Escanear0012.jpg
    Escanear0012.jpg
    85.1 KB · Views: 113
  • Escanear0011.jpg
    Escanear0011.jpg
    121.3 KB · Views: 131
  • Escanear0010.jpg
    Escanear0010.jpg
    184 KB · Views: 153
  • Escanear0009.jpg
    Escanear0009.jpg
    185.6 KB · Views: 141
  • Escanear0008.jpg
    Escanear0008.jpg
    484.6 KB · Views: 125
  • Escanear0007.jpg
    Escanear0007.jpg
    375.1 KB · Views: 99
  • Escanear0006.jpg
    Escanear0006.jpg
    468.2 KB · Views: 101
Some classic stuff here
Post-7
From
-Wingless Flight by R.Dale Reed-NASA 1997
 

Attachments

  • Escanear0007.jpg
    Escanear0007.jpg
    95.9 KB · Views: 110
  • Escanear0006.jpg
    Escanear0006.jpg
    82.8 KB · Views: 106
  • Escanear0005.jpg
    Escanear0005.jpg
    86.6 KB · Views: 111
  • Escanear0004.jpg
    Escanear0004.jpg
    101.2 KB · Views: 102
  • Escanear0003.jpg
    Escanear0003.jpg
    210.3 KB · Views: 110
  • Escanear0002.jpg
    Escanear0002.jpg
    121.3 KB · Views: 142
  • Escanear0001.jpg
    Escanear0001.jpg
    665 KB · Views: 124
Some classic stuff here
Post-8
From
-Le Fanatique de l'Aviation
 

Attachments

  • Escanear0001.jpg
    Escanear0001.jpg
    650.9 KB · Views: 114
Some classic stuff here
Post-9
From
-Le Fanatique de l'Aviation
 

Attachments

  • Escanear0002.jpg
    Escanear0002.jpg
    930.4 KB · Views: 103
THX for Picture Justo

index.php

never know this had a rocket engine

normally it was pull by Cadillac or a aircraft
 
Some classic stuff here
Post-10
From
-Airpower-Sept.2003
-The Dream Machines by Ron Miller
-Flight International-January 2000
-The X-Planes by Jay Miller
-Air International-Oct/Nov 1996
-Aeroplane Montly-August 1978
 

Attachments

  • Escanear0001.jpg
    Escanear0001.jpg
    430.2 KB · Views: 265
  • Escanear0004.jpg
    Escanear0004.jpg
    698.9 KB · Views: 246
  • Escanear0005.jpg
    Escanear0005.jpg
    330.9 KB · Views: 236
  • Escanear0006.jpg
    Escanear0006.jpg
    437.9 KB · Views: 258
  • Escanear0007.jpg
    Escanear0007.jpg
    213.9 KB · Views: 274
  • Escanear0008.jpg
    Escanear0008.jpg
    389.6 KB · Views: 124
Some classic stuff here
Post-11
From
-Airpower-Sept.2003
-The Dream Machines by Ron Miller
-Flight International-January 2000
-The X-Planes by Jay Miller
-Air International-Oct/Nov 1996
-Aeroplane Montly-August 1978
 

Attachments

  • Escanear0016.jpg
    Escanear0016.jpg
    279.2 KB · Views: 135
  • Escanear0015.jpg
    Escanear0015.jpg
    595.4 KB · Views: 115
  • Escanear0014.jpg
    Escanear0014.jpg
    628.5 KB · Views: 107
  • Escanear0013.jpg
    Escanear0013.jpg
    192.7 KB · Views: 115
  • Escanear0012.jpg
    Escanear0012.jpg
    214.9 KB · Views: 114
  • Escanear0011.jpg
    Escanear0011.jpg
    92.2 KB · Views: 102
  • Escanear0010.jpg
    Escanear0010.jpg
    613.4 KB · Views: 122
Some classic stuff here
Post-12
From
-Dyna Soar by Robert Godwin
 

Attachments

  • Escanear0001.jpg
    Escanear0001.jpg
    962.7 KB · Views: 136
Some classic stuff here
Post-13
From
-Space Shuttle by Dennis R. Jenkins
 

Attachments

  • Escanear0003.jpg
    Escanear0003.jpg
    647.5 KB · Views: 150
  • Escanear0002.jpg
    Escanear0002.jpg
    104.9 KB · Views: 152
Some classic stuff here
Post-14
From
-Space Shuttle by Dennis R. Jenkins
-Dyna-Soar by Robert Godwin
 

Attachments

  • Escanear0001.jpg
    Escanear0001.jpg
    348.2 KB · Views: 154
  • Escanear0002.jpg
    Escanear0002.jpg
    124.1 KB · Views: 170
  • Escanear0003.jpg
    Escanear0003.jpg
    158.3 KB · Views: 188
Some classic stuff here
Post-15
From
Unknown Source
 

Attachments

  • Escanear0005.jpg
    Escanear0005.jpg
    245.4 KB · Views: 138
  • Escanear0004.jpg
    Escanear0004.jpg
    136.6 KB · Views: 120
  • Escanear0003.jpg
    Escanear0003.jpg
    253.6 KB · Views: 115
  • Escanear0002.jpg
    Escanear0002.jpg
    693.6 KB · Views: 129
  • Escanear0001.jpg
    Escanear0001.jpg
    660.8 KB · Views: 143
Some classic stuff here
Post-16
From
Unknown Source
 

Attachments

  • Escanear0006.jpg
    Escanear0006.jpg
    521.7 KB · Views: 115
  • Escanear0007.jpg
    Escanear0007.jpg
    394.8 KB · Views: 128
  • Escanear0008.jpg
    Escanear0008.jpg
    265.7 KB · Views: 143
  • Escanear0009.jpg
    Escanear0009.jpg
    351.4 KB · Views: 175
  • Escanear0010.jpg
    Escanear0010.jpg
    335.6 KB · Views: 155
Some classic stuff here
Post-17
From
Unknown Source
 

Attachments

  • Escanear0015.jpg
    Escanear0015.jpg
    88.4 KB · Views: 113
  • Escanear0014.jpg
    Escanear0014.jpg
    235 KB · Views: 120
  • Escanear0013.jpg
    Escanear0013.jpg
    413.2 KB · Views: 133
  • Escanear0012.jpg
    Escanear0012.jpg
    465.2 KB · Views: 110
  • Escanear0011.jpg
    Escanear0011.jpg
    250.1 KB · Views: 94
Some classic stuff here
Post-18
From
Unknown Source
 

Attachments

  • Escanear0021.jpg
    Escanear0021.jpg
    296.5 KB · Views: 122
  • Escanear0020.jpg
    Escanear0020.jpg
    232.8 KB · Views: 144
  • Escanear0018.jpg
    Escanear0018.jpg
    461.2 KB · Views: 129
  • Escanear0017.jpg
    Escanear0017.jpg
    471.6 KB · Views: 114
  • Escanear0016.jpg
    Escanear0016.jpg
    744.7 KB · Views: 88
Some classic stuff here
Post-19
From
Unknown Source
 

Attachments

  • Escanear0022.jpg
    Escanear0022.jpg
    520.2 KB · Views: 106
  • Escanear0023.jpg
    Escanear0023.jpg
    563.6 KB · Views: 142
  • Escanear0024.jpg
    Escanear0024.jpg
    331.3 KB · Views: 179
  • Escanear0025.jpg
    Escanear0025.jpg
    198.4 KB · Views: 176

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom