Register here

Author Topic: Anti-Submarine derivative of RIM-24 Tartar SAM?  (Read 370 times)

Offline Pioneer

  • Senior Member
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • **
  • Posts: 1435
  • Seek out and close with the enemy
Anti-Submarine derivative of RIM-24 Tartar SAM?
« on: December 06, 2017, 12:57:59 am »
G’day gents
I’ve just finished reading the following:

Quote
In Friedman's "Network-Centric Warfare" there is an interesting footnote at p. 311 which talks about those neverweres.

Eight ships, somewhat smaller than contemporary Brooke class U.S. DEGs (398 x 46 vs 415 x 43 ft, 3,300 tons), were included in the projected 1963 program.
Into this smaller hull would have been squeezed much more than in a DEG: one twin 5-inch/38 mount (Signaal N26 fire control system), one Mk.22 missile launcher (16 Tartars with two Mk.74 directors), two Sea Mauler short-range launchers (72 missiles), two triple Mk.32 torpedo tubes, and a single Limbo mortar (60 projectiles).
There would also be a U.S.-type light helicopter (the primary ASW standoff weapon).
Complement was given as 236, compared to 246 for the nonautomated U.S. DEG with a comparable missile battery.
Estimated cost was $34.25 million.
The Canadians adopted the Tartar missile in hopes that the U.S. Navy would develop the projected ASW version of the missile (then unfunded), to carry either a homing torpedo or a depth bomb.
Where the U.S. Navy relied on a massive bow-mounted low frequency sonar (SQS-26), the Canadians held to medium-frequency sets but included a variable-depth sonar aft, which would have made processing at least as complex.
An unusual feature was a requirement to support two hundred troops for up to 15 days.
The design emphasized human engineering, automation (she could steam with her machinery spaces unmanned), and centralized command/control.
Much of the equipment had not yet been developed.

(Source: https://forum.worldofwarships.eu/topic/4250-canadian-navy-never-were-designs/)

By my own admission, I can’t say I’ve ever heard of a anti-submarine derivative program of the RIM-24 Tartar missile.
Can anyone shed some further light on this program please?

Thank you in advance

Regards
Pioneer
And remember…remember the glory is not the exhortation of war, but the exhortation of man.
Mans nobility, made transcendent in the fiery crucible of war.
Faithfulness and fortitude.
Gentleness and compassion.
I am honored to be your brother.”

— Lt Col Ralph Honner DSO M

Offline starviking

  • Senior Member
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • **
  • Posts: 862
Re: Anti-Submarine derivative of RIM-24 Tartar SAM?
« Reply #1 on: December 06, 2017, 05:39:23 am »
I'll copy my reply, with edits,  from the Canadian Patrol Frigate thread.

"I wonder if it's a mistake? Could the Canadians have been wanting ASROC integrated with their Tartar launcher? It was integrated with some Tartar launchers.

Personally, I'd think there'd be way too much design change to turn the Tartar missile into a short-range ASW weapon-delivery system to make it worthwhile."

Offline TomS

  • Senior Member
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • **
  • Posts: 2367
Re: Anti-Submarine derivative of RIM-24 Tartar SAM?
« Reply #2 on: December 06, 2017, 05:56:06 am »
I'm not sure it would have been too difficult, at least in the nuclear version.  The W-44 depth bomb isn't dramatically heavier than the conventional Tartar warhead, and losing the SARH seeker electronics would easily have covered the difference.  A purely ballistic Tartar could have been a more elegant alternative to ASROC.

The downside is that ASROC had quite the head start and could carry a torpedo, which would be a lot harder to fit into Tartar.  So it's not surprising that ASW Tartar would have been a non-starter.

Edit: This is just speculation.  I haven't seen anything outside the one Friedman footnote suggesting that an ASW Tartar was actually considered.  And a great deal of the known discussion about RCN escorts suggests it wasn't seriously considered. 
« Last Edit: December 06, 2017, 09:40:25 am by TomS »

Online sferrin

  • Senior Member
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • **
  • Posts: 9813
Re: Anti-Submarine derivative of RIM-24 Tartar SAM?
« Reply #3 on: December 09, 2017, 05:21:12 am »
I'll copy my reply, with edits,  from the Canadian Patrol Frigate thread.

"I wonder if it's a mistake? Could the Canadians have been wanting ASROC integrated with their Tartar launcher? It was integrated with some Tartar launchers.

Which ones?  I'd heard of Tarter/SM-1 being integrated into the ASROC "pepperbox" (on the Knoxs as I recall) but not the other way round.  ???

edit:  Heh, never mind.


There's also Harpoon.
« Last Edit: December 09, 2017, 05:27:35 am by sferrin »
"DARPA Hard"  It ain't what it use to be.