BAe HOTOL

The December 1986 issue (No.12) of Spaceflight News, pages 12-15, carried an article of mine titled "Composite HOTOL", suggesting that HOTOL should be launched from a carrier plane. Here is my original three-view from which the drawings accompanying the article were enlarged and coloured in:

Much to my surprise, the HOTOL Project and Technical Manager, B.R.A. Burns, wrote a letter in reply, which was published in the March 1987 issue (No.25), Page 31. He questioned in particular the high capital cost of developing a special-purpose carrier aircraft.

At about the same time Bernard Carr, a professional model maker, put forward the idea of modifying a Boeing 747 for this purpose. I still have copies of some of his model photographs and correspondence. A letter to him from the British National Space Centre and dated 19 February 1987 comments, "Your idea of launching HOTOL from an existing aircraft is not new and indeed is already being examined as one of a range of options..." and, "... there are some potential advantages in the subsonic aircraft option ... but it is thought that these may be offset by greater expense. However it is too early yet to come to any conclusions."

Then, B.Ae's news release 124/90 of 5 September 1990 announced a six-month joint study with the Soviet Ministry of Aviation Industry on "Interim HOTOL" (their quotes) which would be launched at an altitude of 9000 metres from the Soviet Antonov AN-225 super transport aircraft.
 

Attachments

  • compositehotolmed.jpg
    compositehotolmed.jpg
    26.4 KB · Views: 518
HOTOL models at Farnborough and - now - at BIS HQ
Mriya-HOTOL models, showing evolution of early concept configurations (later one is from BIS collection, too)
 

Attachments

  • Hotol.jpg
    Hotol.jpg
    90.5 KB · Views: 488
  • 7178073148_efd6d41ddf_b.jpg
    7178073148_efd6d41ddf_b.jpg
    233 KB · Views: 448
  • hotol_bis.jpg
    hotol_bis.jpg
    147.9 KB · Views: 422
  • 7178072536_6b753e7250_o.jpg
    7178072536_6b753e7250_o.jpg
    469.5 KB · Views: 101
  • aviatsionnyy_kosmicheskiy_raketnyy_kompleks_svityaz__4.jpg
    aviatsionnyy_kosmicheskiy_raketnyy_kompleks_svityaz__4.jpg
    83.5 KB · Views: 111
  • BIS-YT-14-04-2015-HOTOL.jpg
    BIS-YT-14-04-2015-HOTOL.jpg
    192.5 KB · Views: 149
Interim HOTOL & Mriya (www.buran.ru)
 

Attachments

  • interim2.jpg
    interim2.jpg
    174.4 KB · Views: 199
  • interim.jpg
    interim.jpg
    277.6 KB · Views: 186
...
 

Attachments

  • Hotol-early_200.jpg
    Hotol-early_200.jpg
    22.1 KB · Views: 562
  • ph_STSconcept_2.gif
    ph_STSconcept_2.gif
    35.2 KB · Views: 143
...
 

Attachments

  • hotol_earth.jpg
    hotol_earth.jpg
    108.3 KB · Views: 180
what for payload is that on Hotol model ?


that on lower right is spacelab hardware, but what is the other ?
 
steelpillow said:
The December 1986 issue (No.12) of Spaceflight News, pages 12-15, carried an article of mine titled "Composite HOTOL", suggesting that HOTOL should be launched from a carrier plane. Here is my original three-view from which the drawings accompanying the article were enlarged and coloured in:

Much to my surprise, the HOTOL Project and Technical Manager, B.R.A. Burns, wrote a letter in reply, which was published in the March 1987 issue (No.25), Page 31. He questioned in particular the high capital cost of developing a special-purpose carrier aircraft.

At about the same time Bernard Carr, a professional model maker, put forward the idea of modifying a Boeing 747 for this purpose. I still have copies of some of his model photographs and correspondence. A letter to him from the British National Space Centre and dated 19 February 1987 comments, "Your idea of launching HOTOL from an existing aircraft is not new and indeed is already being examined as one of a range of options..." and, "... there are some potential advantages in the subsonic aircraft option ... but it is thought that these may be offset by greater expense. However it is too early yet to come to any conclusions."

Then, B.Ae's news release 124/90 of 5 September 1990 announced a six-month joint study with the Soviet Ministry of Aviation Industry on "Interim HOTOL" (their quotes) which would be launched at an altitude of 9000 metres from the Soviet Antonov AN-225 super transport aircraft.

Compare to this design: http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=23384.0

Martin
 
martinbayer said:
steelpillow said:
The December 1986 issue (No.12) of Spaceflight News, pages 12-15, carried an article of mine titled "Composite HOTOL",
Compare to this design: http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=23384.0

Martin

Thank you Martin that is fascinating (though I wish I could read Russian). I never saw Cormier's canard carrier ship design before now - I can promise that I did not copy it! I wonder when he published it, whether it was before or after mine. But eight JT9Ds, phew!
 
Steelpillow,

Cormier published his design in 1979 in the AIAA Paper 79-0879 named "Utility of High Bypass Turbofans for a Two-Stage Transport".

Martin
 
martinbayer said:
Cormier published his design in 1979 in the AIAA Paper 79-0879 named "Utility of High Bypass Turbofans for a Two-Stage Transport".

Thank you. That probably explains his relatively large number of lower-power turbojets. Otherwise, our canard carrier craft are much alike.

I wonder what he envisaged for yaw control - those huge winglets would generate large structural forces if they had rudders attached. My own thought was a fore rudder on the nose pylon as it has a more rigid mounting, along with considerably greater lever arm than the main pylons. Alternatively, differential drag by messing around with the ailerons would be a more conventional approach (e.g. as used on the B-2 Spirit).
 
Quite interesting interview with late John Scott-Scott. HOTOL, RB454 etc

http://sounds.bl.uk/related-content/TRANSCRIPTS/021T-C1379X0032XX-0000A1.pdf
 

Attachments

  • john-scott-scott_l (1).jpg
    john-scott-scott_l (1).jpg
    48.4 KB · Views: 1,008
QI

Source: East, R.A., Hutt, G.A.: Vehicle Geometry Effects on Hypersonic Stability and Control. In: Proc. Symposium on Fluid Dynamics and Space, VKI, Rhode Saint Genese, Belgium (1986)
 

Attachments

  • HOTOL 86.jpg
    HOTOL 86.jpg
    357.8 KB · Views: 874
  • HYPRESONIC AERODYNAMICS - APPLICATIONS FOR HOTOL.pdf
    345.6 KB · Views: 33
...
 

Attachments

  • hotol trolley.jpg
    hotol trolley.jpg
    905.4 KB · Views: 800
HOTOL as it was born
 

Attachments

  • First HOTOL configuration.jpg
    First HOTOL configuration.jpg
    418.2 KB · Views: 767
flateric said:
HOTOL as it was born

I think that is the version that HOTOL should have been before British Aerospace (at that time) changed it to the design that we all know.
 
flateric said:
HOTOL as it was born

Any more information on this configuration? There would appear to be attachment points and what may be umbilical covers aft of the payload bay. For a booster? fuel tank?
 
...
 

Attachments

  • 1986 bae hotol prov payload.jpg
    1986 bae hotol prov payload.jpg
    173.2 KB · Views: 623
Can't link the pdf it is too big

Flateric picture of primitive HOTL come from

https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:ZT1b2VF13u0J:https://www.aiaa.org/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx%3Fid%3D14414+&cd=1&hl=fr&ct=clnk&gl=fr&client=firefox-b

From HOTOL to SKYLON
British Spaceplane Programmes: Past, Present
and Future
 
Additional pic of the early Hotol configuration.
 

Attachments

  • EarlyHotol2.jpg
    EarlyHotol2.jpg
    483.7 KB · Views: 199
PaulMM (Overscan) said:
Additional pic of the early Hotol configuration.

After looking at the early Hotol design, I was wondering does anyone know how many engines the spaceplane had?
 
I often wondered how and why the RB.545 was classified by the British MOD from the beginning.
The classification made things much harder for Bond and co. For example, when pitching HOTOL to ESA at the rome conference in January 1985 they couldn't reveal the inner workings of the RB.545.
I did a quick browse and found this.
https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg13117843-400-technology-patent-office-reveals-hotols-secrets/


31 August 1991


Earlier this month, the British Patent Office finally released the details
of the revolutionary engine that would have powered Britain’s spaceplane
Hotol. Because of its possible military applications, the government put
a security order on the patents eight years ago.

The security order prevented British Aerospace, who were developing
Hotol, from finding overseas collaborators to help them fund the project
and the research foundered.

Suddenly in April, the government lifted the
security order and the patent office quickly processed them and issued them
on 14 August. Now they are available for anyone to read.

Looks like RB.545 was declassified... long after HOTOL was dead (1988 and Thatcher funding withdrawal).
For the record, Bond created REL in 1989 and started working on a different engine to get around the RB.545 classification (Satan, later SABRE)
https://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1989/1989%20-%200765.html

As to why the engine was declassified by 1991 - no idea. But Alan Bond must have been pissed-off.

When the patent was filed in 1983 by its inventor, Alan Bond, it was,
like all British applications, reviewed by a security board at the patent
office. The board referred it to the Ministry of Defence which judged the
engine of significance to national security and classified the application
as secret. Under the standard procedure for classified applications, the
patent then officially ceased to exist.

So that's how the RB.545 become classified.

All this, said Bond, can be done with ‘relatively standard gas turbine
and rocket engine technology’. Bond saw the real challenge being in design
of the heat exchangers. Work on a serpentine arrangement of small bore tubes
with very thin walls made from nickel alloys looked hopeful.

Rolls-Royce later found that when liquid hydrogen is used to cool the
intake air, moisture in the air caused ice to build up in the engine. In
the later patents, the company’s first idea was to use more automatic valves
which gradually open and close to reduce the flow of liquid hydrogen and
oxygen through the heat exchanger when the air is humid.

A year later Rolls-Royce found that the engine thrust then varied as
the heat exchanger valves operated. The company’s next idea was to keep
the rocket motor running in an idling condition at low levels of altitude.
When there is icing, the rocket power is increased to produce extra thrust
which compensates for the loss of power from the jet engine.

Frozen heat exchanger was the main issue (also for aerospaceplane and Japanese LACE)

Here is Alan bond 1983 patent for RB.545
https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/pdfs/0bfe59990ac43e571a1b/US5101622.pdf
https://patents.google.com/patent/US5101622A/en?inventor=Alan+Bond

Priority date
1983-12-23
Filing date
1984-12-20
Publication date
1992-04-07
Grant date
1992-04-07
 
Thanks Grigory, for the picture and data

i really like first version of HOTOL it would have been good SSTO, instead of later version this "flying Hydraulic system"...
 
https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg13117843-400-technology-patent-office-reveals-hotols-secrets/

Rolls-Royce later found that when liquid hydrogen is used to cool the
intake air, moisture in the air caused ice to build up in the engine. In
the later patents, the company’s first idea was to use more automatic valves
which gradually open and close to reduce the flow of liquid hydrogen and
oxygen through the heat exchanger when the air is humid.

A year later Rolls-Royce found that the engine thrust then varied as
the heat exchanger valves operated. The company’s next idea was to keep
the rocket motor running in an idling condition at low levels of altitude.
When there is icing, the rocket power is increased to produce extra thrust
which compensates for the loss of power from the jet engine.

Here is that second patent
https://patents.google.com/patent/US5088280A/en?assignee=Rolls-Royce+Plc&inventor=Alan+Bond

And another
https://www.google.ch/patents/US5085041
 
Hobbes said:
are there any books on HOTOL? Or a decent 3-view drawing?

Not sure about dedicated books though I have sen it mentioned in some. As for images, there is this, though it is not official:
 

Attachments

  • hotol_ortho__new__by_unusualsuspex-d7qqvfz.jpg
    hotol_ortho__new__by_unusualsuspex-d7qqvfz.jpg
    949.7 KB · Views: 628
Yes, I found that one too. Problem is it looks very different from images like this, that show a fuselage with a constant cross-section for most of its length. To me, these seem more feasible, as it's much easier to build a hydrogen tank as a constant-section cylinder compared to an off-axis cone.

hotol-trolley.jpg


and this one published by BAE Systems:
Co7E-PSWcAAx2PF.jpg:small
 
Hobbes said:
are there any books on HOTOL? Or a decent 3-view drawing?
a). https://www.amazon.co.uk/British-Secret-Projects-Britains-Shuttle/dp/1910809020
b). see attached
 

Attachments

  • HOTOL_iterations_to88.jpg
    HOTOL_iterations_to88.jpg
    120 KB · Views: 193
  • hotol evolution.jpg
    hotol evolution.jpg
    460.5 KB · Views: 553
  • 3-view.jpg
    3-view.jpg
    204.1 KB · Views: 616
  • 9783540891802-c1.pdf
    3.2 MB · Views: 45
I just finished reading BSP: 5. HOTOL is only mentioned briefly.

Thanks for the drawings. Do you know where they came from?
 
Design and Operational Analysis of the HOTOL Auxiliary Propulsion Subsystems
J.B. Marshall and G. Statham (t)
British Aerospace Space Systems Ltd.
Argyle Way,Stevenage,England
1991
 
Added a post from ages ago to topic here - https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,277.msg41339.html#msg41339
 
Interim HOTOL designs

The An-225/Interim Hotol launch vehicle R. PARKINSON, British Aerospace Space and Communications, Ltd., Stevenage, England
 

Attachments

  • InterimHotol(0067).png
    InterimHotol(0067).png
    148.6 KB · Views: 125
  • InterimHotol(0068).png
    InterimHotol(0068).png
    312.7 KB · Views: 147
Odd how some of these drawings have no discernible air intake. Is it perhaps supposed to retract for re-entry and landing?
 
Interim Hotol was a simplified design using rocket engines (instead of the airbreathing RB.545), to be air-launched from an An-225. So this had no air intakes.
 
sold for $$$ on eBay
 

Attachments

  • s-l1600 (38).jpg
    s-l1600 (38).jpg
    680.5 KB · Views: 156
  • s-l1600 (39).jpg
    s-l1600 (39).jpg
    662.3 KB · Views: 138
  • s-l1600 (26).jpg
    s-l1600 (26).jpg
    667 KB · Views: 127
  • s-l1600 (27).jpg
    s-l1600 (27).jpg
    587.6 KB · Views: 118
  • s-l1600 (32).jpg
    s-l1600 (32).jpg
    340.8 KB · Views: 112
  • s-l1600 (29).jpg
    s-l1600 (29).jpg
    247.5 KB · Views: 105
  • s-l1600 (25).jpg
    s-l1600 (25).jpg
    364.1 KB · Views: 127
I'll try to acquire this (unless you're already bidding)
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom