Low-Cost Future Light Aircraft of 1940s & 1950s

hesham

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
26 May 2006
Messages
32,495
Reaction score
11,579
Hi,


here is a group of suggested future light aircraft in Popular Science,featured with low-cost and some
of them had new ideas.


 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    100.1 KB · Views: 567
  • 2.png
    2.png
    170.6 KB · Views: 531
  • 3.png
    3.png
    449 KB · Views: 497
  • 4.png
    4.png
    143.9 KB · Views: 430
  • 5.png
    5.png
    683.2 KB · Views: 400
Last edited:
pathology_doc said:
LOL. Did anything in Popular Science or Popular Mechanics ever turn out as they predicted?


I think not Pathology,


that's because most of those ideas was fantasy designs.
 
Last edited:
hesham said:
here is a group of suggested future light aircraft in Popular Science,featured with low-cost and some
of them had new ideas.

Very nice designs... If you'd gone up a bit you'd have found the FIRST page of the article, which states clearly that these are concepts by famous artist Douglas Rolfe!
May I kindly suggest the title of this topic be edited to reflect this important piece of information? Thanks.

https://books.google.com.au/books?id=3CEDAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA104#v=onepage&q&f=false
 

Attachments

  • Rolfe-1944-color.jpg
    Rolfe-1944-color.jpg
    361.4 KB · Views: 86
From Flying magazine 1944-5.
 

Attachments

  • 4-1944-5.png
    4-1944-5.png
    517.1 KB · Views: 56
From Flying magazine 1945-3.
 

Attachments

  • 1-1945-3.png
    1-1945-3.png
    503.4 KB · Views: 55

Attachments

  • 2-1950-8.png
    2-1950-8.png
    447.1 KB · Views: 41
  • 3-1950-8.png
    3-1950-8.png
    324.7 KB · Views: 39
  • 4-1950-8.png
    4-1950-8.png
    522.1 KB · Views: 49
Back in 1945, all the airplane manufacturers were hoping that returning soldiers would want motorcycles, boats, airplanes, etc. for recreation. Fortunately cooler heads prevailed and most returning soldiers tamed their PTSD by reverting to domestic bliss with facotry jobs, wives, 2.5 children, houses, sensible family cars, etc.
This proved a loss for airplane manufacturers. Big firms like Douglas, Lockheed, Republic, etc. built prototypes of "family airplanes, but soon learned that they could not build them for prices that retired soldiers could afford. Even with their massive metal-forming presses and simplified construction methods, Republic built 800 Seabee amphibians before determining that they were selling at a loss.
Existing manufacturers of small planes: Aeronca, Bellanca, Cessna, Fairchild, Interstate, Piper, Rearwin, Stinson, Taylor, Waco, etc. all ramped up production, but their hangars were soon crowded with un-sold planes.

During the 1960s, Cessna tried again to reduce the cost of manufacturing "family airplanes with their Model 160 prototype with corrugated skins, constant-chord wing, free-swivelling nose-wheel,, etc. They flew the Model 160 prototype a few times, still could not reduce production costs by much. Cessna found that the fixed costs of installed parts: engines, propellers, instruments, tires, brakes, etc. were still the majority of the selling price. Cessna never did re-tool to manufacture Model 160s.
 
From Flying 1940-8.
 

Attachments

  • 12.png
    12.png
    1.3 MB · Views: 18

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom