SpaceX Falcon Heavy

blackstar said:
NeilChapman said:
Another good reason for moving to the BFR design.
Click to expand...

Building a big rocket was hard. Building a much bigger rocket should be easier.
Click to expand...

So it seems. Perhaps building a big single rocket is easier than strapping three together.
 
NeilChapman said:
blackstar said:
NeilChapman said:
Another good reason for moving to the BFR design.
Click to expand...

Building a big rocket was hard. Building a much bigger rocket should be easier.
Click to expand...

So it seems. Perhaps building a big single rocket is easier than strapping three together.
Click to expand...

Recovery has to be simpler. It'll be interesting if they try to bring all three boosters back on the first Heavy launch. (Would the two strap-on booster fly back to the Cape with the central booster landing at sea?
 
sferrin said:
Recovery has to be simpler. It'll be interesting if they try to bring all three boosters back on the first Heavy launch. (Would the two strap-on booster fly back to the Cape with the central booster landing at sea?
Click to expand...

So far i know the Two Booster are to land at KSC and Core Stage make a landing on drone ships "Of Course I Still Love You"
But it's will be father out as normal, do longer downrange of Core Stage.
 
Video and pic from Spacex Twitter (video already copied by a Youtuber).

Surprising how Delta 4 Heavy and Falcon Heavy have similar size but >2x difference in performance. It reflects the single RS68 vs 9 Merlin thrust difference (plus upper stage performance of single Merlin vs Centaur). It would seem the Delta is heavier/bigger than it should have been even compared to Atlas V. And of course then there is the price difference as well.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6u0Kfw3UKuY
 

Attachments

  • Falcon Heavy 39A.jpg
    Falcon Heavy 39A.jpg
    162.9 KB · Views: 401
  • Falcon vs Delta 4.jpg
    Falcon vs Delta 4.jpg
    24.3 KB · Views: 388
LH2 has relatively low energy density so the rockets end up bigger. The differences energy density and ISP can make in vehicle size are telling here:

Titan IVB Delta IV Heavy
Vehicle Weight 2,079,060 1,616,000
Thrust at Lift Off 3,400,000 2,130,000
lbs to LEO ~48k ~63k
 

Attachments

  • nasa-launch-vehicles.jpg
    nasa-launch-vehicles.jpg
    36.8 KB · Views: 369
More over here:

https://www.flickr.com/photos/spacex

Looks like lots of plumbing on the outside. I wonder if they'll eventually try cross-feeding like they'd talked about in the past.
 

Attachments

  • 38583829295_d658ecb02f_o.jpg
    38583829295_d658ecb02f_o.jpg
    1.9 MB · Views: 370
The arms connecting the cores at the top may contain electrical connections for the control system. They're in the wrong place for propellant crossfeed.
 
Hobbes said:
The arms connecting the cores at the top may contain electrical connections for the control system. They're in the wrong place for propellant crossfeed.
Click to expand...

It will be interesting to see if those nose caps on the boosters and the horizontal conduits have much of an effect on the flight back.
 
Good point about the conduit -- at the high angle-of-attack these boosters take in the final phase of the landing maneuver, the conduit might act like a strake (think Standard missile). likely the conduit will be oriented on the downstream side of the booster to keep it in the aerodynamic 'shadow'.

Or, am I full of it?

David
 
merriman said:
Good point about the conduit -- at the high angle-of-attack these boosters take in the final phase of the landing maneuver, the conduit might act like a strake (think Standard missile). likely the conduit will be oriented on the downstream side of the booster to keep it in the aerodynamic 'shadow'.

Or, am I full of it?

David
Click to expand...

No idea. I was wondering where the split on the horizontal conduits are. Do they all stay with the core? Does a portion stay with the booster, and if so, how much is the asymmetry going to effect things? I've no doubt they've studied all this, and maybe the computer, thrusters, and control surfaces have enough smarts and authority to compensate. Will definitely be interesting. :D
 
In the animation, the horizontal conduits are folded up and stay with the central core.
 
https://www.instagram.com/p/BdjBHqdAIzs/

Hold-down test fire next week. Launch end of the month.
Click to expand...

Delays might be due to Zuma. Hopefully 'next week' means something like Monday. 'End of the month' almost certainly rules out the Jan 15th window as well.
 
sferrin said:
Looks like lots of plumbing on the outside. I wonder if they'll eventually try cross-feeding like they'd talked about in the past.
Click to expand...
No, cross-feed is dead.
 
Somewhat over the top presentation but this guy does a good job explaining the historical timeline for Falcon Heavy development and includes a lot of interesting technical details on how it evolved.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FOdoNQXQYv8
 
Short but interesting comparison video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GRqZ0sjuso
 
Hobbes said:
The boosters have 2 raceways each: a large one on one side, and a much narrower one on the opposite side. As far as I can see, the 2 side boosters are identical, not mirrored.
Click to expand...

If they were mirrored, they wouldn't be identical
 
NeilChapman said:
blackstar said:
NeilChapman said:
Another good reason for moving to the BFR design.
Click to expand...

Building a big rocket was hard. Building a much bigger rocket should be easier.
Click to expand...

So it seems. Perhaps building a big single rocket is easier than strapping three together.
Click to expand...

It isn't that hard strapping three together. See Delta IV Heavy, Titan IV and Titan III.
 
It is when you're using rockets that weren't originally designed for it and are intended to be reusable.
 
Dragon029 said:
It is when you're using rockets that weren't originally designed for it and are intended to be reusable.
Click to expand...

Wrong on both parts. Reusability has no part in the issue. It doesn't come into play while they are all strapped together.
And FH was alway part of the equation, no different than Delta IV heavy.

the issue is the separation of the strap on boosters without the use of solid motor separation rockets.
 
Byeman said:
the issue is the separation of the strap on boosters without the use of solid motor separation rockets.
Click to expand...

They still have the cold gas maneuver system.
 
sferrin said:
Byeman said:
the issue is the separation of the strap on boosters without the use of solid motor separation rockets.
Click to expand...

They still have the cold gas maneuver system.
Click to expand...

That is the issue. Can't get the same type of impulse from it.
 
SpaceX's preference appears to be to avoid expendable components wherever possible. Instead of solid rockets, there are pneumatic pushers in the longerons (struts) connecting the side boosters to the core to expedite the separation. I believe the center engine in the boosters will also restart after separation to help keep the side boosters clear of the core.
 
TomS said:
SpaceX's preference appears to be to avoid expendable components wherever possible. Instead of solid rockets, there are pneumatic pushers in the longerons (struts) connecting the side boosters to the core to expedite the separation. I believe the center engine in the boosters will also restart after separation to help keep the side boosters clear of the core.
Click to expand...

They likely won't shut them down. Restart would take too long.
 
Byeman said:
TomS said:
SpaceX's preference appears to be to avoid expendable components wherever possible. Instead of solid rockets, there are pneumatic pushers in the longerons (struts) connecting the side boosters to the core to expedite the separation. I believe the center engine in the boosters will also restart after separation to help keep the side boosters clear of the core.
Click to expand...

They likely won't shut them down. Restart would take too long.
Click to expand...

nope, not Restart or High altitude ignition for core
all three stages take off with Rocket power, but the core stage Merlin engines are on minimum thrust
after Booster jettison they go on full throttle, advantage lower fuel consumption for core stage during Booster operation.
 
Byeman said:
TomS said:
SpaceX's preference appears to be to avoid expendable components wherever possible. Instead of solid rockets, there are pneumatic pushers in the longerons (struts) connecting the side boosters to the core to expedite the separation. I believe the center engine in the boosters will also restart after separation to help keep the side boosters clear of the core.
Click to expand...

They likely won't shut them down. Restart would take too long.
Click to expand...

You're right, I mis-remembered something I'd read. I found this comment in the environmental impact statement confirming that the side booster center engines don't shut down.

"The center engine in each side core continues to burn for a few seconds after separation to control the trajectory of the side booster."
Click to expand...

The center engine gimbals, so it's got quite a bit of authority to keep the side booster away for the core after the separation pushers get it started.
 
something going on at Pad 39A

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UtrFjzDaeMA
 
They did a propellant load test/wet dress rehearsal on Saturday. Apparently they can't do the planned static fire because the range personnel are mostly furloughed.
 
Also here, if you're more digitally minded: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/22/science/falcon-heavy-spacex-elon-musk.html
 
Live coverage: Falcon Heavy test-firing planned Wednesday

https://spaceflightnow.com/2018/01/09/falcon-heavy-demo-flight-preparations/

When's the last time anybody ever test fired 5 million+ pounds of thrust? The only two examples that come to mind are the 5 F-1s tests for Apollo and the AJ260 solid motor.
 
Hey! ... it didn't explode. I call that a win.

What I could hear there was about four-seconds of water sound/heat suppression and seven-seconds of engine(s) run. Wow!

Can't wait to see the close up shots of this test. Just ... Wow!

David
 
Nothing on Spacex twitter yet. Here is a slightly better view.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NuXHriwQB9g
 
Pretty short firing. I wonder if there was an abort? Just have to wait for the official statement.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTqbKDl4yAo


Update: Musk's twitter statement---
"Falcon Heavy hold-down firing this morning was good. Generated quite a thunderhead of steam. Launching in a week or so."
 
The normal static fire for Falcon 9 is 3.5 seconds. This seems like it was at least that long.
 
The White House seems interested in the Falcon Heavy launch

That appeared to be confirmed Saturday in a tweet by Nick Ayers, chief of staff for Pence. Referring directly to the upcoming Falcon Heavy launch, Ayers tweeted, "Major (positive) ramifications for US space industry if this goes according to plan." Here, a key Pence confidant seems to be saying that the Falcon Heavy could prove a game changer by offering the United States a new launch capability at low cost to taxpayers.
Click to expand...

https://arstechnica.com/science/2018/01/the-white-house-seems-interested-in-the-falcon-heavy-launch/
 
February 6th.

"Aiming for first flight of Falcon Heavy on Feb 6 from Apollo launchpad 39A at Cape Kennedy. Easy viewing from the public causeway."
 
"The Federal Aviation Administration has approved a launch license for SpaceX’s Falcon Heavy rocket set for blastoff Tuesday, giving the U.S. government’s regulatory green light for the heavy-lifter to dispatch Elon Musk’s used electric sports car on a one-way trip into deep space.

Dated Feb. 2, the FAA launch license clears a final regulatory hurdle for the Falcon Heavy’s test launch from pad 39A at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida.

The launch window Tuesday opens at 1:30 p.m. EST (1830 GMT) and extends until 4 p.m. EST (2100 GMT).

The official weather forecast issued Sunday by the U.S. Air Force’s 45th Weather Squadron predicts an 80 percent chance of favorable conditions during Tuesday’s launch window.

“On Tuesday, winds will become easterly at 15 mph, bringing a few low-level clouds in off the water,” forecasters wrote in Sunday’s outlook. “The main weather concerns are liftoff winds and thick clouds. Maximum upper-level winds will be from the west at 90 knots near 40,000 feet.”"

https://twitter.com/SpaceflightNow

"Falcon Heavy remains go for launch at 1:30pm on Tuesday" - Elon Musk (That was yesterday so we'll see.)
 

Attachments

  • DVQqyL3WAAAi6F7.jpg
    DVQqyL3WAAAi6F7.jpg
    77.1 KB · Views: 219
There is interesting Detail about Musk Roadster.
on the Dashboard is small model of Tesla roaster with a figure in space suit.
now that Roadster is on Falcon Heavy with Dummy in space suit on driver seat...
 
Just publish by SpaceX
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tk338VXcb24
 
I can't hear sound at the moment. They better be playing the intro to Heavy Metal when they show that car flying through space! ;D
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom