Consolidated Tailless Bomber

overscan (PaulMM)

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
27 December 2005
Messages
16,317
Reaction score
18,572
Being unfamiliar with WW2 projects, what is this tailless Consolidated Vultee bomber (?) design?

http://crgis.ndc.nasa.gov/historic/Additional_Photos_for_12-Foot_Low_Speed_Tunnel#Consolidated_Model
 

Attachments

  • LMAL_37489.jpg
    LMAL_37489.jpg
    243.3 KB · Views: 932
Same, with wing sections extended fore and aft.

http://crgis.ndc.nasa.gov/historic/File:LMAL_46747.jpg
 

Attachments

  • LMAL_46747.jpg
    LMAL_46747.jpg
    477.4 KB · Views: 801
Tailless Twin-Engine Patrol Studies (1943): possibly a proposal for a PV-1 and PV-2 replacement won by Lockheed with its P2V Neptune.

Source: Convair Advanced Designs. Secret Projects from San Diego 1923-1962. Robert E. Bradley. page 165
 
Heh - I haven't opened my copy of that yet!

More here:

http://crgis.ndc.nasa.gov/historic/Additional_Photos_for_12-Foot_Low_Speed_Tunnel_3#Model_.2340
 

Attachments

  • LMAL_38724.jpg
    LMAL_38724.jpg
    128.9 KB · Views: 697
  • LMAL_38720.jpg
    LMAL_38720.jpg
    58.4 KB · Views: 692
  • LMAL_36286.jpg
    LMAL_36286.jpg
    231.4 KB · Views: 692
Interesting. Never come across this project before.

(My first post here - Hi everyone. :) )
 
This might be old news by now but ... according to Alan Griffith (aka ACResearcher), there were at least three proposals for Consolidated flying wings. The first was a Sept 1941 twin-engined bomber wing a 130 foot span for the USAAC. This variant was later pitched to the US Navy as a "so-called 'Patrol Bomber', Consolidated designation P5Y1". Consolidated was quite persistent with their 'P5Y1". A 1944 brochure for a "Performance Report Two Engine Patrol Landplane Tailless Type" appeared on eBay"

http://www.ebay.com/itm/RARE-CONSOLIDATED-REPORT-ON-TAILLESS-AIRCRAFT-/291040911366

"Another variant was to have a wingspan of 134 feet with a gross weight of 90,000lbs. This version was tested in GALCIT wind tunnel in 1943." This would be the version illustrated here.

"Finally, there was a 180,000lb, 180ft wing span beast sporting four engines. This final version was to have a range of 7500 miles."

http://www.hyperscale.com/2015/reviews/books/amsecprojbookpreview_1.htm

According to Claus Reuter (The Development of the Heavy Bomber 1918-1944, page 61), the final, 180 foot span concept was to have each of four buried turbocharged tractor engines driving its own counter-rotating propellers through extension shafts. This bomber would have been highly loaded but control on landing was to be aided by full-span flaps and retractable horizontal tail surfaces.

Crew positions were to be pressurized, including the turrets. Defensive armament was to consist of a nose turret (4 x .50-cal), dorsal and ventral turrets (each with 2 x 37mm cannons). Normal offensive armament load would be 5,000 lbs with a crew of 9 flying at 240 mph over 7,500 miles. Up to 40,000 lbs could be carried over 3,500 miles. Gross weight was about 180,000 lbs.

A variation on the theme had a large, central tailfin. See 'Free Flight Tests of a Consolidated-Vultee Tailless Model', NASA Langley CRGIS video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjYKWtOZ7wE
 
A bit more ... attached are specs and a three-view drawing from that 1944 brochure from eBay.

Powerplant was to be twin Pratt & Whitney R-4360 Wasp Majors but span is listed as 147 feet (whereas Alan Griffith suggested that this was to be based on the 130 foot span Army bomber's airframe).
 

Attachments

  • consolidated-tailless-specs.jpg
    consolidated-tailless-specs.jpg
    86.2 KB · Views: 211
  • consolidated-tailless-3v.jpg
    consolidated-tailless-3v.jpg
    89.7 KB · Views: 229
More images of that project:
 

Attachments

  • 4588021295_16991cc179_o.jpg
    4588021295_16991cc179_o.jpg
    69.7 KB · Views: 285
  • Consolidated-Patrol-Bomber-.gif
    Consolidated-Patrol-Bomber-.gif
    901.4 KB · Views: 295
A splendid painting by Daniel Uhr:

a79dd425849887.5634bb5176f36.jpg


  • His topic on this forum: http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,18167.0/all.html
  • His website: http://duhraviationart.com/
 
The artwork by Daniel Uhr is the cover art from American Secret Projects: Fighters Bombers and Attack Aircraft, 1937-1945 by Tony Buttler and Alan Griffith, Crecy Publishing Ltd, Copyright 2015. I worked very closely with Daniel as he created this beautiful rendition. As one who is extremely pleased to be able to occasionally freehand a straight line I can only be in awe of folks who can come up with such art.

I have a substantial amount of information on these Consolidated tailless bomber projects in my collection, including the document to which Apophenia refers above as well as a number of NACA test results, proposals to the military, etc. I will be going into depth on these aircraft in a future publication.

Cockpit side up.

AlanG
 
Interesting to compare this to:
- The Kalinin VS-2/K-12, K-14, K-16, K-18 program (https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,4819.0.html)
- The Boeing B-306 program (https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,304.0/all.html)
 
I suppose that be unsterstood that Tailess formula for Bombers was highly problematic .
 
Hesham,

It would be good for you to mention the author of these books, in this case my friend Bob Bradly - an excellent researcher and a fine gentleman.

I will say I found a tremendous amount on all these aircraft in various archives before I met Bob, but he generously shared his wisdom with me on a number of projects.

AlanG
 

Attachments

  • consolidated flying wing 8.jpg
    consolidated flying wing 8.jpg
    43.2 KB · Views: 28
  • consolidated flying wing 7.jpg
    consolidated flying wing 7.jpg
    36.9 KB · Views: 17
  • consolidated flying wing 6.jpg
    consolidated flying wing 6.jpg
    37.5 KB · Views: 17
  • consolidated flying wing 5.jpg
    consolidated flying wing 5.jpg
    34.9 KB · Views: 17
  • consolidated flying wing 4.jpg
    consolidated flying wing 4.jpg
    39.9 KB · Views: 18
  • consolidated flying wing 3.jpg
    consolidated flying wing 3.jpg
    30.4 KB · Views: 20
  • consolidated flying wing 2.jpg
    consolidated flying wing 2.jpg
    24.5 KB · Views: 30
Back
Top Bottom