Soviet make a unlicensed copy of a western fighter

Status
Not open for further replies.
M

Monk78

ACCESS: Confidential
Joined
13 March 2024
Messages
76
Reaction score
22
Which western fighter from 60s to 70s would have been the easiest for the Soviets to copy ( not just airframe but also engine avionics and weapon systems)
It must be an aircraft that is helpful to their military doctrine and not purely an attack aircraft of fighter lineage
 
Last edited:
Monk78 said:
Which western fighter from 60s to 70s would have been the easiest for the Soviets to copy and also would be the most useful for them ?
Click to expand...
Easiest - F-5. Mirages are also in the running.
Most useful to them: F-15, and, before that, F-4.
 
GTX said:
It's not just the airframe though. To get most benefit one needs all the subsystems...and that is where things will get tricky.
Click to expand...
Agree so that’s why let me add which aircraft and it’s compatible weapon systems would be the most suitable
 
Easy answer - none of them.

F-86 Sabre - work started on copying it but it was abandoned. Some technology was borrowed and Sukhoi's S-1/T-1 lineage has a little bit of influence.

Mirage III has no obvious advantage over the MiG-21. Ditto Lightning.

F-4 Phantom II was acquired but while some technologies were borrowed, there was no desire to copy the entire aircraft.

F-5 was acquired but while some technologies were borrowed, there was no desire to copy the entire aircraft.

Sukhoi and Mikoyan did study the F-15 layout and both concluded the integral layout was better. So there would be no desire to copy the F-15 either.
 
tomo pauk said:
I favor the III.
It is very easy to make the V out of it if/when desired.
Click to expand...
My thought is Soviets already have an established interceptor in mig21 a much better F4 minus in the form of mig23 is coming up
Why not make a Nesher type cheaper version rather than waste time with su25 , it can be a success as a export aircraft, probably better all round aircraft than the mig23ms or mig21bis
Su25 roles can be fulfilled by helicopters
 
Can Soviets copy the mirage III /V engine or better to use one of their own ?
 
Monk78 said:
My thought is Soviets already have an established interceptor in mig21 a much better F4 minus in the form of mig23 is coming up
Click to expand...

Mirages were with a far better range/radius, and FWIW, were regarded very, very high by one of the the most successful Cold War airforces - Israeli one.
F4 > 'F4 minus'.

Monk78 said:
Why not make a Nesher type cheaper version rather than waste time with su25 , it can be a success as a export aircraft, probably better all round aircraft than the mig23ms or mig21bis
Click to expand...

No objections by me there.

Monk78 said:
Su25 roles can be fulfilled by helicopters
Click to expand...

I'd disagree there. Su-25 was carrying far greater bomb+rocket load, and was with a potent cannon from day one. It was also outfitted with laser range finder/marker from get go.

Monk78 said:
Can Soviets copy the mirage III /V engine or better to use one of their own ?
Click to expand...

Soviet engines were probably no worse than the Atars.
 
tomo pauk said:
Mirages were with a far better range/radius, and FWIW, were regarded very, very high by one of the the most successful Cold War airforces - Israeli one.
F4 > 'F4 minus'.
Click to expand...
Can soviet GCI support such a long range interceptor ? Are we totally changing Soviet air combat doctrine too ?

F4 Soviets cannot match but a F4 minus is still better than most other aircraft of its era

Also if they mass produce mirage III what should they do with the mig23 program and thousands of mig21 ?
 
Monk78 said:
Can soviet GCI support such a long range interceptor ? Are we totally changing Soviet air combat doctrine too ?
Click to expand...

You wanted a copy of Western fighter. F-4 was the best game in town before F-14 and F-15 arrived.
How Soviets will be using it is on them.

Monk78 said:
F4 Soviets cannot match but a F4 minus is still better than most other aircraft of its era
Click to expand...

Same as above - F4 beats a 'F4 minus', so there is no reason to go for the worse option.

Monk78 said:
Also if they mass produce mirage III what should they do with the mig23 program and thousands of mig21 ?
Click to expand...
We can rejoice - MiG-23 is canned, and MiG-21 production is ending by the time Mirage III is in production.
 
tomo pauk said:
You wanted a copy of Western fighter. F-4 was the best game in town before F-14 and F-15 arrived.
How Soviets will be using it is on them.



Same as above - F4 beats a 'F4 minus', so there is no reason to go for the worse option.


We can rejoice - MiG-23 is canned, and MiG-21 production is ending by the time Mirage III is in production.
Click to expand...
So essentially to copy any western fighter worth the effort Soviets would have to change the way they were planning to fight air war and pilot training too
 
Monk78 said:
Why not make a Nesher type cheaper version rather than waste time with su25
Click to expand...
I would take an Su-25 over a Nesher / Mirage V every day.

tomo pauk said:
We can rejoice - MiG-23 is canned, and MiG-21 production is ending by the time Mirage III is in production.
Click to expand...
Mirage III and MiG-21 are near contemporary. MiG-21 production didn't end until 1985 AFAIK.

You can argue which is better, but unless the Soviets got one of the first Mirage III prototypes somehow, it will always be too late to put into production.

Whole topic is a bit pointless IMHO.
 
Monk78 said:
So essentially to copy any western fighter worth the effort Soviets would have to change the way they were planning to fight air war and pilot training too
Click to expand...

Americans were changing their training from 1960s into the 1970s, so let's not give the Soviets the free pass here.
Having a better tool is a feature, not a bug.
 
tomo pauk said:
Americans were changing their training from 1960s into the 1970s, so let's not give the Soviets the free pass here.
Having a better tool is a feature, not a bug.
Click to expand...
But if anything the soviet system will be more inflexible and inefficient, we cannot expect them to completely overhaul it within 5 yrs
 
Last edited:
overscan (PaulMM) said:
I would take an Su-25 over a Nesher / Mirage V every day.


Mirage III and MiG-21 are near contemporary. MiG-21 production didn't end until 1985 AFAIK.

You can argue which is better, but unless the Soviets got one of the first Mirage III prototypes somehow, it will always be too late to put into production.

Whole topic is a bit pointless IMHO.
Click to expand...
As a strike / CAS platform undoubtably the frogfoot is superior however here we are trying to create a jack of all trades fighter for export market and maybe non NATO facing areas of USSR
Soviets already had a plethora of much more survivable strike platforms in that era , frogfoot would have a very short lifespan ( shorter than even the average Soviet aircraft) when faced with NATO defenses. Where frogfoot really was effective was against less sophisticated opposition, but in that case it’s better to go for a low tech fighter which is a more versatile platform

Mig21bis production lasted until 1982 yes but if this fictional fighter has been built then bis may not have been built for export
 
tomo pauk said:
Americans were changing their training from 1960s into the 1970s, so let's not give the Soviets the free pass here.
Having a better tool is a feature, not a bug.
Click to expand...
Because the US was only training for BVR intercepting (and mostly non-maneuverable bombers at that!) in the early 1960s, not having to mix it up with fighters or fighter-bombers WVR.

Vietnam demonstrated that BVR-only training was a terrible idea.
 
Scott Kenny said:
Because the US was only training for BVR intercepting (and mostly non-maneuverable bombers at that!) in the early 1960s, not having to mix it up with fighters or fighter-bombers WVR.

Vietnam demonstrated that BVR-only training was a terrible idea.
Click to expand...

Soviets were also switching into long-range shots, provided aircraft were capable of doing that in the 1st place (requiring big radar, long range, and as big missiles as possible). This is why the Su-9/-11/-15, Tu-26 and MiG-25 emerged, the gunless fighters that relied on these missiles to hit the - preferably - bombers of the likely enemy.
USSR even wanted to remove the cannons from the MiG-21s in a short period of time.

USA + NATO were also introducing the AIM-9 as a short-range missile, that were usable even from the fighters that have had meager radar sets, like the F-86 or F-5A. Soviets were also trying to do the same with the MiG-19 and -21, with varying degree of success.

Yes, not training and preparing for all-range combat (as far as technology is allowing) was a mistake.
 
Why would the Soviets want to copy Western fighters? They clearly had a doctorine and design path of their own to persue. Avionics being about the only thing they would really like to copy perhaps to boost their own capabilities.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom