Register here

Author Topic: Russian Kh-101 Cruise Missile  (Read 20697 times)

Offline Sentinel Chicken

  • Senior Member
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • **
  • Posts: 577
  • American 71 Heavy, contact departure 126.47
    • Airlinebuzz
Russian Kh-101 Cruise Missile
« on: December 03, 2006, 02:17:19 pm »
Interesting. I seem to recall there was a proposed Russian cruise missile design that also used a propfan. The ol' memory is a bit fuzzy on the details, but I seem to recall some sort of mid-fuselage mounted prop.........

Offline PaulMM (Overscan)

  • Secret Projects Forum Founder
  • Administrator
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • *****
  • Posts: 8282
  • Paul Martell-Mead
    • Secret Projects
Re: Russian Kh-101 Cruise Missile
« Reply #1 on: December 03, 2006, 02:19:28 pm »
Kh-101 was thought to use a propfan originally, though later on a turbofan was substituted.
"I'm always right except when persuaded otherwise against my better judgement"
                                                             
- Sir Sydney Camm

Offline flateric

  • Deputy Administrator
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • ****
  • Posts: 7045
Re: Russian Kh-101 Cruise Missile
« Reply #2 on: December 04, 2006, 02:04:23 am »
Kh-101 drawings (c) Piotr Butowski, International Air Power Review
and Kh-101 R128-300 proposed propfan from Paralay site.
"There are many disbelievers in
stealth, more than a few of them truly technically ignorant and proud of it." Sherm Mullin, Skunk Works

Offline elmayerle

  • Aerospace Engineer
  • Senior Member
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • **
  • Posts: 1042
Re: Russian Kh-101 Cruise Missile
« Reply #3 on: December 05, 2006, 07:53:59 am »
The turbofan greatly resmebles the one used by TSSAM.   If you're not especially worried about RCS, the propfan works well for extending range.

Offline Sentinel Chicken

  • Senior Member
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • **
  • Posts: 577
  • American 71 Heavy, contact departure 126.47
    • Airlinebuzz
Re: Russian Kh-101 Cruise Missile
« Reply #4 on: December 05, 2006, 10:50:48 am »
The turbofan greatly resmebles the one used by TSSAM.   If you're not especially worried about RCS, the propfan works well for extending range.
This might sound simplistic, but couldn't you just use propfan blades made of composites and no metal components?

Offline elmayerle

  • Aerospace Engineer
  • Senior Member
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • **
  • Posts: 1042
Re: Russian Kh-101 Cruise Missile
« Reply #5 on: December 05, 2006, 11:32:16 am »
You'll still get some glinting.  Composite blades would be a bit of a challenge if they were carried stowed and had to deploy on launch; carried deployed would work but would also add to the drag of the carrying platform.

Offline Deino

  • Our China Correspondent
  • Global Moderator
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • ****
  • Posts: 1834
Re: Russian Kh-101 Cruise Missile
« Reply #6 on: October 11, 2007, 07:49:15 am »
In the latest issue of „Combat Aircraft“ (Vol. 8 No. 5, page 29) is a single picture showing that Tu-95MS + 16 missiles said to be the Ch-101.

Does anyone have some more information ?


Deino
« Last Edit: October 11, 2007, 12:15:21 pm by Deino »
He was my North, my South, my East and West,
My working week and my Sunday rest,
My noon, my midnight, my talk, my song;
I thought that love would last forever; I was wrong.
...
For nothing now can ever come to any good.
-------------------------------------------------
W.H.Auden (1945)

Offline PaulMM (Overscan)

  • Secret Projects Forum Founder
  • Administrator
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • *****
  • Posts: 8282
  • Paul Martell-Mead
    • Secret Projects
Re: Russian Kh-101 Cruise Missile
« Reply #7 on: October 11, 2007, 08:39:00 am »
Merged with older discussion
"I'm always right except when persuaded otherwise against my better judgement"
                                                             
- Sir Sydney Camm

Offline Deino

  • Our China Correspondent
  • Global Moderator
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • ****
  • Posts: 1834
Re: Russian Kh-101 Cruise Missile
« Reply #8 on: October 11, 2007, 09:19:52 am »
Merged with older discussion

Sorry that I started a new tread but after using the search function with Kh-101 as a key-word I got nothing !   :(
He was my North, my South, my East and West,
My working week and my Sunday rest,
My noon, my midnight, my talk, my song;
I thought that love would last forever; I was wrong.
...
For nothing now can ever come to any good.
-------------------------------------------------
W.H.Auden (1945)

Offline PaulMM (Overscan)

  • Secret Projects Forum Founder
  • Administrator
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • *****
  • Posts: 8282
  • Paul Martell-Mead
    • Secret Projects
Re: Russian Kh-101 Cruise Missile
« Reply #9 on: October 11, 2007, 09:23:07 am »
It was buried in a strange topic - I split it and merged with your post :)
"I'm always right except when persuaded otherwise against my better judgement"
                                                             
- Sir Sydney Camm

Offline GTX

  • Senior Member
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • **
  • Posts: 1786
  • All hail the God of Frustration!!!
    • Beyond The Sprues
Re: Russian Kh-101 Cruise Missile
« Reply #10 on: October 13, 2007, 01:08:57 pm »
Hi folks,

For a look at a US equivalent have a look at http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,1883.0.html

Regards,

Greg

Offline PaulMM (Overscan)

  • Secret Projects Forum Founder
  • Administrator
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • *****
  • Posts: 8282
  • Paul Martell-Mead
    • Secret Projects
Re: Russian Kh-101 Cruise Missile
« Reply #11 on: October 14, 2007, 11:11:17 pm »
Not easy to see any details. Seems to have a triangular fuselage section, engine is probably a turbofan, mounted in the rear with a low profile intake underneath (as opposed to the pop out engine from Kh-55). Folded fins look odd...
"I'm always right except when persuaded otherwise against my better judgement"
                                                             
- Sir Sydney Camm

Offline paralay

  • Senior Member
  • CLEARANCE: Confidential
  • **
  • Posts: 98
    • "Стелс машины"
Re: Russian Kh-101 Cruise Missile
« Reply #12 on: October 17, 2007, 11:16:11 am »
 8)

Offline Deino

  • Our China Correspondent
  • Global Moderator
  • CLEARANCE: Top Secret
  • ****
  • Posts: 1834
Re: Russian Kh-101 Cruise Missile
« Reply #13 on: October 22, 2007, 12:27:32 pm »
Jane's short note on the Kh-101:

http://www.janes.com/news/defence/systems/jdw/jdw071022_1_n.shtml

And there's another picture available, but sadly only very small ...  Anyone with a larger version of that ???? PLEASE !!!

Deino   ???
He was my North, my South, my East and West,
My working week and my Sunday rest,
My noon, my midnight, my talk, my song;
I thought that love would last forever; I was wrong.
...
For nothing now can ever come to any good.
-------------------------------------------------
W.H.Auden (1945)

Offline muxel

  • Senior Member
  • CLEARANCE: Restricted
  • **
  • Posts: 10
    • http://forums.airbase.ru
Re: Russian Kh-101 Cruise Missile
« Reply #14 on: October 25, 2007, 08:39:23 am »
Full article from JDW.

Jane's Defence Weekly - October 24, 2007

Details emerge of Russia's latest cruise missiles

Robert Hewson Jane's Air-Launched Weapons Editor
   London


Exclusive images of Russia's two most advanced long-range airborne weapons - the Kh-101 and Kh-555 conventionally armed cruise missiles - have recently been acquired by Jane's .

Russia has been modernising its cruise missile inventory over the past few years and has recently increased the operational tempo of the strategic bomber fleet that would deploy such weapons.

Developed by the Raduga Design Bureau (now part of the unified Tactical Missiles Corporation), the Kh-555 is a modified version of the original nuclear-tipped Kh-55 strategic stand-off weapon (AS-15 'Kent'). It is thought to have entered service in 2004, but details are scant. The Kh-101 is a stealth-optimised design, conceived as a Kh-55 replacement. No images of this missile have previously been shown in public.

In the imagery acquired by Jane's , the Kh-101 is seen carried in pairs on four pylons under an upgraded Tu-95MS16 'Bear-H' (Tu-95MSM) bomber. The Tu-95MS16 variant can carry a theoretical load of 16 cruise missiles (Kh-55s): 10 on underwing pylons and six on its MKU-6-5 internal rotary launcher. This 'overload', which requires two pylons each to carry three missiles, proved to be impractical and is not used operationally. Typically, the combat load for a 'Bear' would be carried on the internal launcher only to maximise aircraft range.

The Tu-95MS16 variant maintains the ability to carry underwing missiles as seen in the image (unlike the Tu-95MS6). The eight Kh-101 configuration may be the (maximum) standard load for this new weapon. The aircraft is adorned with photo calibration markings and so the red-painted missiles are likely to be a trial fit.

The Kh-101 appears to be longer than the Kh-55/555 series (approximately 7 m in length) with a more slender and angular design. The missile has a chiselled nose section and a flat-sided triangular main body, all calculated to reduce radar cross-section. Three folding tail fins are mounted at the end of a tapered rear section. A pop-out wing is mounted under the missile, which is thought to be powered by an NPO Saturn TRDD-50 turbojet. The podded engine is housed inside the rear of the missile and drops down on a pylon when the missile is released from its launch aircraft.

The operational status of the Kh-101 is still not clear, although it is obviously in an advanced test and development stage and is probably available for use. Russian sources note that flights with the missile and the Tu-95MSM have been ongoing for over a year.

Photographs of the Kh-555 being loaded onto a Tu-95 are significant because this missile had previously been associated only with the Tu-160 'Blackjack' bomber. It was always probable that the Kh-555 would be integrated with the Tu-95 but doing so increases the operational flexibility of Russia's bomber force and provides the Tu-95 with a modern conventional weapon capability for the first time.

Given the increased size of the Kh-101 (about 1 m longer than the Kh-55), it is unlikely that this missile can be carried on the standard MKU-6-5 internal launcher. It is possible that a conventionally armed Tu-95 could operate with a mix of external Kh-101s and internal Kh-555s.

Pics
  • The first pictures of the Kh-101 cruise missile to emerge in public show eight of the stealthy missiles loaded on an upgraded Tu-95MS bomber (Via Robert Hewson)
  • Russian ground crew load a Kh-555 into the internal weapons bay of a Tu-95MS. The missile’s conventional warhead section appears to be shorter than the nuclear Kh-55 (Via Robert Hewson)