Register here

Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
Aerospace / Re: F-X -- NGAD (Next Generation Air Dominance) -- F/A-XX
« Last post by Geoff_B on Today at 04:00:55 am »
What's happening with the F/A-XX USN aspect of the programme ?
4
Military / China's PLAN new LHD project
« Last post by dan_inbox on Yesterday at 11:41:54 pm »
Finally a model of China's new LHD project, the Type 075.

Said to displace 36,000 tonnes and operate 28 helicopters, under construction at Shanghai' Hudong-Zhonghua shipyards since late 2016.

 
5
Aerospace / Re: Sikorsky CH-53K Super Stallion Heavy Lift Replacement (HLR)
« Last post by Triton on Yesterday at 08:03:08 pm »
"Lockheed’s $29 Billion Copter Poised to Win Pentagon’s Approval"
by Anthony Capaccio and Julie Johnsson
March 27, 2017, 2:00 AM PDT

Source:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-03-27/lockheed-s-29-billion-copter-poised-to-win-pentagon-s-approval

Quote
The Pentagon is poised to review -- and probably approve -- a new helicopter from Lockheed Martin Corp. to transport heavy cargo for the Marine Corps in a program valued at as much as $29 billion.

The Defense Acquisition Board has scheduled a March 30 meeting to review whether to approve low-rate production for the first 24 of a planned 200 King Stallion helicopters. The initial contract would cover two of the aircraft capable of lifting 27,000 pounds (12,200 kilograms), according to Defense Department documents. Quantities would grow annually, to four next year and 14 in fiscal 2021, according to the latest published acquisition report.

Approval to proceed would be the first major acquisition decision under Defense Secretary James Mattis. It would also begin to unlock the revenue Lockheed expects to reap from sales, spares and repairs over the life of the program. The latest budget plan increases spending to $1.9 billion in fiscal 2020 from $892 million this year, including development.

The “big” revenue potential for the helicopter designated the CH-53K was the primary incentive for Lockheed’s $9 billion acquisition of the Sikorsky helicopter unit from United Technologies Corp. in 2015, Bruce Tanner, Lockheed’s chief financial officer, said in an interview. He said the King Stallion is the same size as its predecessor, the Super Stallion, but can haul triple the cargo.

“Frankly, when we acquired Sikorsky it was the 53K program that drove most of our valuation as to why we wanted to own Sikorsky,” Tanner said. “It was the fact of that aircraft.”


Potential Overshadowed

The King Stallion has international sales potential as well, and discussions are under way with Germany and Israel, Tanner said. “From a revenue perspective it is going to be the lion’s share of what we expect from Sikorsky for the next 10 to 15 years, probably, once it gets into production,” Tanner said.

The helicopter’s potential was overshadowed as Lockheed wrestled with accounting-control weaknesses and plummeting commercial helicopter deliveries at Sikorsky.

Cheap fuel prices have slowed offshore oil and gas drilling and sapped demand for the large helicopters that industry uses to ferry people and equipment. Deliveries of commercial choppers are expected to generate less than $300 million in revenue this year, down from sales of about $1.25 billion in 2014, before Lockheed’s acquisition, according to estimates by Jefferies.

The King Stallion should generate more than $500 million this year for Lockheed, according to Howard Rubel, a defense analyst at Jefferies.

The Marines will probably be the biggest customer, although there’s a chance the Navy could join in if it needs to add a craft with larger capacity, Richard Aboulafia, a defense analyst with the Teal Group, said in an email.

The commercial market is less promising. “Much of the world heavy lift market has gone with Boeing’s CH-47 over the past few decades,” Aboulafia said. “The CH-53K might be too big and expensive to change that.”

‘Lot of Money’

Democratic Representative Niki Tsongas questioned the helicopter’s currently projected production cost of $122 million per chopper at a congressional hearing on March 10.

That’s “a heck of a lot of money,” Tsongas said. “And even if there is no additional cost growth, it seems worth pointing out that $122 million per aircraft” exceeds the current cost of Lockheed’s F-35. The latest Air Force model of the advanced fighter jet is estimated to cost $94 million each, including engines.


The King Stallion’s cost is estimated to drop below $89 million after full-rate production begins, Marine Lieutenant General Gary Thomas, deputy for programs, said at the hearing. “That’s still very expensive and we’re working very hard with” Lockheed “to keep the cost down and to drive value for the taxpayer.”
Testing Office

A spokesman for the Pentagon’s test office said in an email that the helicopter is on course to meet its key performance parameters for range, payload and reliability, citing a Feb. 24 assessment. Army Lieutenant Colonel Roger Cabiness said the helicopter has so far demonstrated it’s reliable and available 85 percent of the time needed -- exceeding the 83 percent required at this point.

The King Stallion has demonstrated to date that it has the capability to support the “most stressing” Marine missions, Cabiness said. Still, one of the helicopter’s most serious problems is the high temperature of engine exhaust from two of its three engines, which must be fixed, the testing office assessment found.

“We will continue to track system maturation as we further demonstrate the capabilities of the aircraft and implement any needed improvements,”  Mike Torok, Lockheed’s program manager for the CH-53K, said in an email. “We remain confident as we head toward” the Pentagon decision.
6
Aerospace / Re: US Navy’s UCLASS / CBARS / MQ-XX UAV Programs
« Last post by marauder2048 on Yesterday at 07:25:51 pm »
With the South Koreans apparently passing on the refurbed S-3s, you might as well do an unmanned version. 
7
Aerospace / Re: F-X -- NGAD (Next Generation Air Dominance) -- F/A-XX
« Last post by bobbymike on Yesterday at 05:42:03 pm »
Pentagon directs start of potential new major weapon system program to replace F-22A
March 28, 2017

The Obama administration's Pentagon -- in one of its last official acts -- directed the Air Force in January to begin work on a new Penetrating Counterair capability, kicking off an analysis of alternatives for its Next-Generation Air Dominance program that aims to develop a follow-on to the F-22A Raptor, the U.S. military's marquee twin-engine, stealth fighter.

On Jan. 17, then-Pentagon acquisition executive Frank Kendall approved an Air Force request to transition the Next-Generation Air Dominance program into the acquisition pipeline, setting in place plans to consider launching a Penetrating Counterair (PCA) technology maturation and risk reduction program as soon as next summer, according to a Defense Department official.

The Penetrating Counterair capability is deemed critical -- not only to ensuring air dominance by the 2030s -- but also for the United States to maintain technical competitive superiority.

Kendall signed an acquisition decision memorandum, marking the PCA materiel development decision, according to the DOD official.

The then-Pentagon acquisition executive approved the project, informally referred to as a sixth-generation fighter, to enter the materiel solution analysis phase of the defense acquisition system and “initiating an analysis of alternatives to recapitalize the air superiority mission set created by the forecast retirement of the F-22A,” according to the official.

Kendall designated PCA a pre-major defense acquisition program and the office of the Pentagon's acquisition executive remains the milestone decision authority for the project, according to the official.

Significantly, Kendall did not direct the Air Force to consider restarting the F-22A production line as one possible way to deliver a new PCA capability, the official said.

The service -- at the direction of Congress last year -- is studying what it would cost to get the twin-engine, fifth-generation fighter aircraft production line up and running to buy an additional 194 aircraft. That study is not yet complete, according to the official.

During this early phase of defining a potential new major weapon system, the service sponsor typically conducts analysis and other activities that translates validated capability gaps into system-specific requirements -- which includes identifying characteristics deemed critical or essential to an effective military capability. The program is also to execute planning to support a proposed PCA acquisition strategy.

The Air Force has not yet made any decision on whether to entrust the fledgling PCA program to the traditional acquisition track or hand it to its Rapid Capabilities Office, formed in 2003 to bypass the traditional acquisition system, according to the source.

Air Combat Command -- which spearheaded work beginning in 2009 on a requirement for an F-22A replacement, blessed in 2013 by Pentagon top brass on the Joint Requirements Oversight Council -- is leading the analysis of alternatives.

“The NGAD AOA began in January of 2017 and will conclude in the summer of 2018,” a spokesman for ACC's plans and programs office (A5/8/9) conducting the AOA told Inside Defense. “The AOA will evaluate various alternatives for a Penetrating Counterair capability. Capability development efforts for PCA will focus on maximizing tradeoffs between range, payload, survivability, lethality, affordability, and supportability.”

The PCA capability was a central outcome of the service's “Air Superiority 2030” Enterprise Capability Collaboration Team initiative completed last spring, and effectively rebranded what the service had previously called Next-Generation Air Dominance 2030. That study was completed in April 2016.

Last summer, Congress approved an Air Force request to shift $24 million between accounts to boost spending on NGAD in order to keep the project on track for the January milestone review, a move that raised total available FY-17 funds to $32.5 million.

Then, as part of a Trump administration gambit to increase military spending in FY-17 above amounts set in law, the Air Force on March 16 requested an additional $147 million for the NGAD -- an increase that would lift spending to $167.5 million -- a hike of more than 1,800 percent compared to the service's Feb. 2016 FY-17 budget request.
8
Aerospace / Re: Japan partners with UK to study future fighter
« Last post by Flyaway on Yesterday at 01:21:44 pm »
Merged duplicate topics.

Sorry I missed the existing thread.
9
Aerospace / Re: Japan partners with UK to study future fighter
« Last post by PaulMM (Overscan) on Yesterday at 12:04:55 pm »
Merged duplicate topics.
10
Aerospace / Re: Japan partners with UK to study future fighter
« Last post by Triton on Yesterday at 12:02:04 pm »
"Japan and UK to Collaborate on Advanced Stealth Fighter Jet"
By Franz-Stefan Gady
March 28, 2017

Source:
http://thediplomat.com/2017/03/japan-and-uk-to-collaborate-on-advanced-stealth-fighter-jet/

Quote
Japan’s Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics Agency and the United Kingdom’s Ministry of Defense have concluded an agreement to explore options for co-developing an advanced fighter jet, according to a March 16 press release by the Japanese Ministry of Defense.

The agreement stipulates that both countries will exchange information about advanced aviation technology and also conduct a joint study on the feasibility of co-developing a new fighter aircraft in the coming years.

The press release further notes that Japan will continue to explore fighter jet co-development options with other countries. “Regarding the possibility of international joint development on fighter aircraft in the future, we will continue to exchange views with other countries,” the MoD statement reads.

While the next-generation fighter jet project would be the biggest Japan-UK collaboration on sensitive defense technology so far, both countries are also a working on jointly developing a new ramjet-powered, beyond a visual range air-to-air missile.

During a January 2016 visit, the UK defense minister and his Japanese counterpart agreed to move discussions on the project to the next stage. The aim of the project is to integrate Japanese seeker technologies into the European Meteor Beyond Visual Range Air-to-Air Missile.

In October 2016, the UK Royal Air Force (RAF) and the Japan Air Self-Defense Force (JASDF) also held their first-ever joint aerial combat drill, dubbed Guardian North 16, in Japan. The exercise involved four RAF Eurofighter Typhoon fighter jets, JASDF Boeing F-15J all-weather air superiority fighters and Mitsubishi F-2s.

The Eurofighter consortium, which includes the United Kingdom, unsuccessfully tried to pitch the Eurofighter Typhoon aircraft to Japan in 2011. The JASDF, however, opted for the U.S.-made F-35A Lightning II stealth fighter jet instead. Japan placed an order for 42 F-35 through the U.S. Foreign Military Sales Program in 2011. The first aircraft was handed over to the JASDF in December 2016.

Nevertheless, the F-35 order is an interim solution and Japan is slated to procure up to 100 new fifth-generation air superiority fighters by the 2030s. An estimated $40 billion contract is expected to be awarded in the summer of 2018 (See: “Japan’s Air Force to Receive 100 New Stealth Fighter Jets”).

As I explained in July 2016, Japan has three options for procuring for the new aircraft: “First, develop an indigenous air superiority fighter. Second, partner with a foreign defense contractor and license-produce a new aircraft. Third, import or upgrade an existing platform.” The UK-Japan joint study falls into the second option of partnering with a foreign aircraft maker.

However, U.S. aircraft makers will remain Japan’s top choice for any future fighter jet co-development projects. Last year, Japan unveiled an experimental fifth-generation fighter technology demonstrator, dubbed X-2 “Shinshin” (formerly the ATD-X), which will be the basis for the JASDF’s so-called (F-3) Future Fighter Program. As I reported last year, U.S. defense contractor Lockheed-Martin is purportedly already involved with the project in some capacity.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10