kaiserbill said:
Thanks for that detail!

A question about your point number 2:

Is the TEL therefore an 8X8 version of the LZN, or a different vehicle?

Same drive-line, engine, wheels etc - I don't know any more than that I'm afraid.
 
I believe this was intended to be more of a Buffel replacement vehicle (armoured personnel carrier), than a Ratel replacement (that would rather have been the AC-100). A reasonable amount of info has already been posted - this is brochure adds some new detail and a few new pics.

The troops exercising with it are clearly older Citizen/Reserve force types.
 

Attachments

  • AC-200-03.jpg
    AC-200-03.jpg
    439.8 KB · Views: 179
  • AC-200-04.jpg
    AC-200-04.jpg
    398.9 KB · Views: 152
  • AC-200-05.jpg
    AC-200-05.jpg
    479.1 KB · Views: 163
  • AC-200-06.jpg
    AC-200-06.jpg
    353.3 KB · Views: 190
The Fort Klapperkop exhibition mentioned earlier. Some interesting Mine Resistant prototypes on the left.
 

Attachments

  • 991004295 Klapperkop uitstalling.jpg
    991004295 Klapperkop uitstalling.jpg
    394.1 KB · Views: 190
Graugrun said:
I believe this was intended to be more of a Buffel replacement vehicle (armoured personnel carrier), than a Ratel replacement (that would rather have been the AC-100). A reasonable amount of info has already been posted - this is brochure adds some new detail and a few new pics.

The troops exercising with it are clearly older Citizen/Reserve force types.
This design reminds me of the Serbian Lazar 1 MRAP. Does the brochure have a picture of the back of the vehicle? Were there doors and/or ramp present?
 
During the Bush war the SADF tried and tested a myriad of mine detection, mine lifting and mine clearing devices. Here is a mine plough fitted to the front of a Ratel IFV. As far as is known, this was not a very successful design. Pictures from www.
 

Attachments

  • Ratel ploeg1.jpg
    Ratel ploeg1.jpg
    21 KB · Views: 842
  • Ratel ploeg 2.jpg
    Ratel ploeg 2.jpg
    100.9 KB · Views: 252
From this declassified Movements Signal for Ops Modular, a request is made of 1 x MAN 8x8. Some pictures of the MAN 8x8 is SADF service have emerged in the past. Wander what it was used for that the SAMIL/Kwevoel 100 could not do? It should have had better mobility in poor soil conditions.
 

Attachments

  • 01182008001 1 MAN8x8.jpg
    01182008001 1 MAN8x8.jpg
    27.8 KB · Views: 257
Reply to post #1217
There was a report in the late eighties or early nineties that the SAMIL 100 was not entirely satisfactory. Its mobility and apparently durability was inadequate when heavily loaded under adverse conditions. For a 10 ton payload in a truck with the very long wheelbase of the big SAMIL, an 8 x 8 would definately have been prefereable.
 
Herman said:
Reply to post #1217
There was a report in the late eighties or early nineties that the SAMIL 100 was not entirely satisfactory. Its mobility and apparently durability was inadequate when heavily loaded under adverse conditions. For a 10 ton payload in a truck with the very long wheelbase of the big SAMIL, an 8 x 8 would definately have been prefereable.

One MAN 8x8 truck amongst many SAMIL/Kwevoel 100's would not have changed the fortunes of Ops Moduler, but as it was called up with a tank squadron it must have been for a special purpose, such as to assist with recovery of vehicles in the deep loose sand, or special delivery in difficult terrain? How the SADF obtained MAN 8x8's under sanctions and what for what purpose is yet to be disclosed.
 
sa_bushwar said:
How the SADF obtained MAN 8x8's under sanctions and what for what purpose is yet to be disclosed.


I'm on holiday, and have managed to sneak a peek at Secretprojects briefly now...


It is worth bearing in mind that MAN trucks have been assembled in South Africa for over half a century.
The factory is in Pinetown, just outside Durban.


I don't think it would have been too hard to translate that into sub-assembly or component import for specific vehicles.
Also, South Africas heavy industry/engineering sector, particularly the mining sector, probably meant dual use components, sub-assemblies, or even entire vehicles were quite easily obtained, as long as discretion was exercised in their use.
 
kaiserbill said:
sa_bushwar said:
How the SADF obtained MAN 8x8's under sanctions and what for what purpose is yet to be disclosed.


I'm on holiday, and have managed to sneak a peek at Secretprojects briefly now...


It is worth bearing in mind that MAN trucks have been assembled in South Africa for over half a century.
The factory is in Pinetown, just outside Durban.


I don't think it would have been too hard to translate that into sub-assembly or component import for specific vehicles.
Also, South Africas heavy industry/engineering sector, particularly the mining sector, probably meant dual use components, sub-assemblies, or even entire vehicles were quite easily obtained, as long as discretion was exercised in their use.

Possible, could be the same way the Wolf Turbo mine protected vehicle was built in SWA on a MAN drive train? Co-operation with Germany continued to an extent even during the sanction years. Examples are certain Ratel IFV components, Unimogs for the MRL's, and development the of the Rooikat 8x8 fire support vehicle.
 
*another pic of that Ferret conversion for the parabats.
 

Attachments

  • para ferret 10659106_592372064222591_6399749322536959377_o.jpg
    para ferret 10659106_592372064222591_6399749322536959377_o.jpg
    85 KB · Views: 298
*off f/b again.
 

Attachments

  • g6 proto 10422046_10205062482866811_7961201518249198210_n.jpg
    g6 proto 10422046_10205062482866811_7961201518249198210_n.jpg
    45 KB · Views: 283
  • g6 proto 10547596_10205062482306797_4963011293497394951_n.jpg
    g6 proto 10547596_10205062482306797_4963011293497394951_n.jpg
    53.2 KB · Views: 278
sry for the little bit offtopic pic,found it on my old harddisk,it`s iraqi but i guess SA had some input
 

Attachments

  • 20d89572dbbe8f6120ac3920159a6338.jpg
    20d89572dbbe8f6120ac3920159a6338.jpg
    49.6 KB · Views: 140
While the 6x6 SPG is strongly associated with South Africa and the G6 the idea actually came from Canada and SRC (Gerald Bull) based on the forestry vehicles that worked down the road from their range on the Quebec-Vermont border. The vehicles for the Iraqi prototype 6x6 SPGs (155mm and 210mm) designed by SRC were as I recall built in Spain. I think we have some more information on this topic in the forum somewhere. SRC designed guns built by their various affiliates (Austrian and South African) were sold to both sides of the Iran-Iraq War.
 
The Rheimetall RWG-52 should be mentioned here. Probably developed mainly to allow Rheimetall/Denel to compete for the Indian SPG competition while avoiding the "blacklisting" status of Denel.
 
Herman said:
The Rheimetall RWG-52 should be mentioned here. Probably developed mainly to allow Rheimetall/Denel to compete for the Indian SPG competition while avoiding the "blacklisting" status of Denel.

The blacklisting is no more. The Indian authorities could not prove the allegations after 8 years of investigation. It was cynical to begin with.

So Denel are free to trade in India again.
 
Reply to post #1228


The blacklisting is no more. The Indian authorities could not prove the allegations after 8 years of investigation. It was cynical to begin with.


OK. The blacklisting was as a result of the NTW-20 business, if I recall correctly?
 
Herman said:
Reply to post #1228


The blacklisting is no more. The Indian authorities could not prove the allegations after 8 years of investigation. It was cynical to begin with.


OK. The blacklisting was as a result of the NTW-20 business, if I recall correctly?

Yes , the allegations were spurious at face value as the DRDO then started making the Vidhwansak AMR which is an obvious blatant copy of the NTW-20.
 
Dinges said:
Herman said:
Reply to post #1228


The blacklisting is no more. The Indian authorities could not prove the allegations after 8 years of investigation. It was cynical to begin with.


OK. The blacklisting was as a result of the NTW-20 business, if I recall correctly?

Yes , the allegations were spurious at face value as the DRDO then started making the Vidhwansak AMR which is an obvious blatant copy of the NTW-20.

And, apparently, an inferior copy to boot. They seem to have gotten too ambitious before they had the basics nailed down, with the result that the Indian Army refused to accept it into service.
 
Rooikat prototype undergoing what appears to be mobility evaluation alongside a T55 tanks and BTR60 8x8. The vehicle on the right appears to be a Noddy car (Eland 90)? A bit of speculation: The surroundings look like the artillery range near Potchefstroom and if so, Prof Hekkie Harmse from North West University's soil mechanics department was most likely involved, as he was with the mobility testing of the G5 and G6 development.

The Rooikat prototype has the word "Cheetah" written in white letters on the side. The turret is also one of the prototypes; a similar turret can still be seen on the 8x8 concept vehicle build from Ratel parts at the Bloemfontein armour museum.
 

Attachments

  • SCAN0018 Rooikat prototipe.jpg
    SCAN0018 Rooikat prototipe.jpg
    105.5 KB · Views: 341
kaiserbill said:
Graugrun said:
Short article from Janes IDR 3-1998, on the Lion, which I don't think anything has been posted on yet in this thread.

Very good.

A couple of pics of the Lion was posted earlier in the thread, but there was a lack of info regarding the vehicle.
This explains quite a bit.

I wonder if there is any family ties to the Sterkhans 6X6 vehicle mentioned earlier, about which there is very little info?
Also manufactured by WFM, it seems to have been a Wolf 6X6 derivitive.

I would imagin that the Sterk Hans would allso use the MAN engine and drive train as used on the Wolf.
 
sa_bushwar said:
Rooikat prototype undergoing what appears to be mobility evaluation alongside a T55 tanks and BTR60 8x8. The vehicle on the right appears to be a Noddy car (Eland 90)? A bit of speculation: The surroundings look like the artillery range near Potchefstroom and if so, Prof Hekkie Harmse from North West University's soil mechanics department was most likely involved, as he was with the mobility testing of the G5 and G6 development.

The Rooikat prototype has the word "Cheetah" written in white letters on the side. The turret is also one of the prototypes; a similar turret can still be seen on the 8x8 concept vehicle build from Ratel parts at the Bloemfontein armour museum.

A close-up of the same early Rooikat prototype undergoing trials, also showing the prototype turret and armament. The main gun shown here is not the production 76mm. The prototype is still void of any detail fixtures and fittings found on the production model.
 

Attachments

  • SCAN0020 Rooikat prototipe.jpg
    SCAN0020 Rooikat prototipe.jpg
    69.7 KB · Views: 316
Reply to post # 1235


The gun appears to be the same as those used on the Saracen-based, Ratel-based and Eland-based Rooikat concept vehicles, i.e. the 77mm HV gun taken from the Comet tank.
 
I'm looking for pictures and information about the prototype Plofadders that were used in Ops Modular, Hooper and Packer in 1988/89. It was a vitally important new weapon to breach the extensive mine fields behind which the FAPLA forces took in depth defensive positions. The prototype plofadders however often failed to deploy or detonate, delaying the SADF advance. Was it the man-pack version, or the version mounted and launched from a Casspir? The extract from the signal dated 15-10-87 below suggests it was the Casspir mounted versions.

English translation:
Your signal xxxx refers - The Plofadder is air transportable. This HQ does not support the air transport of the vehicle. The Plofadders (two prototypes) will be repaired and send by road to 24 Field Sqn if this request is approved by the Branch HQ Rundu after approval of the Planning (- for Ops Modular).
 

Attachments

  • 01182008016 Ops Moduler Plofadder sein.jpg
    01182008016 Ops Moduler Plofadder sein.jpg
    68.1 KB · Views: 270
sa_bushwar said:
I'm looking for pictures and information about the prototype Plofadders that were used in Ops Modular, Hooper and Packer in 1988/89. It was a vitally important new weapon to breach the extensive mine fields behind which the FAPLA forces took in depth defensive positions. The prototype plofadders however often failed to deploy or detonate, delaying the SADF advance. Was it the man-pack version, or the version mounted and launched from a Casspir? The extract from the signal dated 15-10-87 below suggests it was the Casspir mounted versions.

English translation:
Your signal xxxx refers - The Plofadder is air transportable. This HQ does not support the air transport of the vehicle. The Plofadders (two prototypes) will be repaired and send by road to 24 Field Sqn if this request is approved by the Branch HQ Rundu after approval of the Planning (- for Ops Modular).

Just to explain, the plofadder is a rocket propelled rope charge to breach a way through a mine field. (Named after the Puff Adder, an African snake)
 

Attachments

  • 320x240_0.jpg
    320x240_0.jpg
    84 KB · Views: 275
Just back from a 3 week trip.

Excellent pics, SA Bushwar and Curious George.

That is that 8X8 prototype vehicle that we think was entered into the original Ratel project by the SA Army Technical Services as the Springkaan, now to be found at the Armour Museum in poor condition.

Also, nice pic of that Rooikat development Cheetah vehicle earlier.
I must have another look, and compare it to the older black and white pics and see how it fits in.
EDIT: Definitely the same vehicle as the earlier one from the black and white pics, with Cheetah written on the side.
The confusion for me came in when some of the earlier B&W pics had different, larger tyres fitted, changing the perspective of size of the vehicle, for me at least. It also had "Fat Cat" written on the side, obviously in light of the "fatter" tyres perhaps. The 3rd pic below shows it with tyres more akin to the usual production Rooikat ones.

I think this is the vehicle developed from the original entrants (Ratel, Eland, and Saracen components) that then morphed further into the Class 2b New Generation Armoured Car (last pic), that then in turn was developed into the production Rooikat.
 

Attachments

  • class2bNGACP2.jpg
    class2bNGACP2.jpg
    12.9 KB · Views: 152
  • rooikattest1.jpg
    rooikattest1.jpg
    47.7 KB · Views: 134
  • rooikattest2.jpg
    rooikattest2.jpg
    42.6 KB · Views: 134
  • rooikattest3.jpg
    rooikattest3.jpg
    43.7 KB · Views: 154
*off f/book again. ;)
 

Attachments

  • rec  5782_600110683448729_5533539179294934378_o.jpg
    rec 5782_600110683448729_5533539179294934378_o.jpg
    91 KB · Views: 149
  • rec 600110750115389_7787662909523755977_o.jpg
    rec 600110750115389_7787662909523755977_o.jpg
    101.4 KB · Views: 149
Nice!

So, it seems at least 2 of these large 8X8 "Skerpioen" vehicles were built, as you alluded to earlier in the thread.

This looks like an offroad support/maintenance vehicle (for Rooikat?) whilst the first one seemed to be a load carrier/support.
 
Reply to post #1242


Yes, it is the supposed Sprinkaan. Interesting picture because it was not taken where the vehicle is residing currently, in Bloemfontein. The paintwork is also different. Is this the same vehicle or were there possibly two of the things built?
 
Actually, looking at the 2 new pics of the large 8X8 vehicle Curious George has posted, the "Skerpioen", they look like 2 seperate vehicles, particularly the rear of the vehicle. Add the original pic from a while back, and perhaps we have 3 different vehicles?

Intriguing vehicle, in any event.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom