flateric

ACCESS: USAP
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
1 April 2006
Messages
10,719
Reaction score
6,685

Attachments

  • $_57 (2).JPG
    $_57 (2).JPG
    209.5 KB · Views: 235
  • usaf-northrop-harassment-weapons_1_78daee6bd4dce3354d3dfa7b387cd432 (1).jpg
    usaf-northrop-harassment-weapons_1_78daee6bd4dce3354d3dfa7b387cd432 (1).jpg
    118 KB · Views: 223
  • usaf-northrop-harassment-weapons_1_78daee6bd4dce3354d3dfa7b387cd432 (2).jpg
    usaf-northrop-harassment-weapons_1_78daee6bd4dce3354d3dfa7b387cd432 (2).jpg
    128.9 KB · Views: 203
  • usaf-northrop-harassment-weapons_1_78daee6bd4dce3354d3dfa7b387cd432 (3).jpg
    usaf-northrop-harassment-weapons_1_78daee6bd4dce3354d3dfa7b387cd432 (3).jpg
    181.2 KB · Views: 186
  • usaf-northrop-harassment-weapons_1_78daee6bd4dce3354d3dfa7b387cd432.jpg
    usaf-northrop-harassment-weapons_1_78daee6bd4dce3354d3dfa7b387cd432.jpg
    206.2 KB · Views: 204
i finally found what i think is a picture of the MBB proposal for the DAR (drohne anti-radar)
In cooperation with its British partner company Marconi, MBB is participating in the definition phase for an anti-radar drone DAR (Drohne AntiRadar) under competitive conditions. Similar to the KDH (Army Combat Drone) presented in the last ADLG, the DAR is launched in swarms from a container. It is designed to engage strong anti-aircraft dispositives and other high-value radiating targets. When deployed, a DAR mission proceeds through the phases of "system checkout," "refueling" and "mission planning" at the ground facility, launch from the container, flight to the target area, search flight in the target area and vertical dive into the target. The DAR, equipped with a passive radar broadband seeker and a multi-purpose warhead, is scheduled to enter troop service in the early 1990s. With its munitions-like storage and ease of logistical handling, this disposable drone represents a low-cost, high-impact weapon system for destroying fire control and search radars and radiating command and control facilities. DAR is expected to be used in support of, among other things, "Follow On Forces Attack" and "Offensive Counter Air" missions by NATO tactical air forces flying in the depths of WAPA space, with the opening of air defense-free or air defense-weakened entry corridors into the enemy rear as the primary mission.
Source
 

Attachments

  • MBBDAR.JPG
    MBBDAR.JPG
    133.8 KB · Views: 141
Okay, lets do it.

Air Force is awarding contracts to build and fly low-cost harassment drones
to E-Systems, Lockheed Missiles & Space and Northrop. The move follows
Advanced Research Projects Agency-funded studies by the first two firms to
explore ways of reducing the cost of expendable mini—drones to the point
where they might assist tactical aircraft in harassing air defenses.
Aviation Week 9th Feb 1976

Low cost harassment drone, a mini-remotely piloted vehicle which Lockheed
has designed fer the Air Force, is 8 ft. long, has a 7-ft. wingspan and will
weigh 60-80 lb. (AW&ST Feb. 9, p. 9). The RPV is expected to cruise at 60
kt., achieve dive speeds of 100 kt. and have an endurance of 6 hr.
Aviation Week 16 Feb 1976

USAF has tested successfully an experimental 55-lb. mini-RPV, built by
E-Systems, in the role of an harassment type vehicle, including tests in which the
mini-RPV homes on a ground-based radio emitter tower. The tests, being conducted
at Nellis AFB, Nev., are using the E-Systems Model E-45.
USAF, with funding support from the West German government, has contracted
with three companies—E-Systems, Lockheed and Northrop—to construct
several experimental mini-RPVs for evaluation as expendable harassment-type
vehicles. The E-Systems vehicle will be a single-boom modification of company’s
earlier twin-boom E-100 mini-RPV. Lockheed will build a twin-boom vehicle
and Northrop plans to use a small delta-wing design.
Aviation Week 17 May 1976
 
Last edited:
These harassment drones were different than the LOCUST program the Army was doing right? Did LOCUST evolve into Aquila?

LOCUST1.JPG
LOCUST2.JPG Locust3.JPG
 
I haven't traced it out yet, but I suspect the US/FRG LOCUST program replaced the earlier studies.
 
Following recent successful demonstration of USAF’s experimental miniature harassment-type drone in West Germany, using a 55-lb. E-Systems Melpar Div. mini—RPV, German defense officials nicknamed the drone “Qualgeist,” the name of a benign, friendly ghost, as distinguished from a “poltergeist,” which is more mischievous.
Two RPV programs that the USAF’s Tactical Air Command had endorsed for Fiscal 1978 funding—the high-altitude Boeing Compass Cope and the small, low cost harassment drone—both were victims of congressional action that threatens their existence. The congressional action on the harassment drone program evoked widespread criticism from USAF and other Defense Dept. representatives.
Aviation Week 20th June 1977
 
Last edited:
Federal Republic of Germany shortly will request proposals for design of a miniature harassment drone, and bids from German companies are due by late November. Originally West Germany planned to underwrite half the cost of the U. S. Air Force harassment drone program. But when Congress refused to approve USAF’s Fiscal 1978 request for $2.5 million for engineering development, West Germany decided to proceed on its own
Aviation Week 31st October 1977
 
An expanding combat role for the mini-RPV is forecast by David R. Heebner. senior vice president of Science Applications. Inc, and a former deputy director of Defense research and engineering. Heebner said that the effectiveness of the Warsaw Pact‘s mobile air defenses depends upon maintaining effective
command-control communications to allocate defenses against potential targets.

Through the use of small harassment drones~armed with explosives sufficient to seriously damage mobile Warsaw Pact radars and communications facilities— “we can stress the air defense command and control for a small fraction of the cost in a way that capitalizes on the limited information handling properties of the air defense system in a way that conventional jamming systems do not." Heebner said. Additionally, he said. the use of harassment drones can force an invasion force to expend its necessarily limited supply of air defense weapons against relatively inexpensive targets.

This, he said, “will slow his advance by making a greater demand on his air defense ordnance resupply." Noting that Congress had turned down
an Air Force Fiscal 1978 request for a couple million dollars needed to begin development of a harassment drone,
Heebner suggested that the request might have been approved if the project had been named “Killer Bee."
Aviation Week 13th March 1978
 
U. 5. Air Force, Germany Press Harassment Drone Development

U. S. Air Force and the Federal Republic of Germany are expected to select two suppliers for competitive engineering development of a small, low-cost harassment drone carrying explosives and designed to home on enemy radars and other targets. Request for industry proposals is expected to be issued late this year by USAF’s Aeronautical Systems Div., which hopes to select the two contractors by next spring.

Each is to deliver more than a dozen flight models for a competitive flyoff. Contenders are expected to include E-Systems, Lockheed and Northrop,
which earlier performed USAF-funded design studies and built prototype models,
and a team consisting of Messerschmitt-Boelkow-Blohm and Teledyne Brown. MBB has developed a small drone vehicle with foldable wings that can be launched from a cylindrical container. Demonstration launches were conducted last year at the Navy test facility at Dahlgren, Va.

A small drone/remotely piloted vehicle design developed by the Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory, the XBQM—106, fabricated from low-cost plastic materials, is another possible contender. This design would be available to companies that do not have their own airframe designs.

USAF recently released a preliminary draft of the proposed specifications to industry for comments. Last year, Congress rejected USAF’s request for funds with which to launch the development effort. This year, USAF requested $3.8 million for the program. with comparable funds expected to be supplied by West Germany.

Initially, the Senate Appropriations Committee turned down the request, while the House Appropriations Committee approved the program but recommended that it be transferred to the Army.


The House action was prompted by concern that USAF and the Tactical Air Command were not too interested in drones whereas the Army and its Aviation Systems Command have shown keen interest in miniature remotely piloted vehicles (AW&ST June 20, 1977, p. 81). USAF officials, including Lt. Gen.
Thomas P. Stafford, deputy chief of staff for research and development, made a strong presentation in support of the Air Force’s interest in the low-cost drone. This prompted the joint conference committee to recommend that the full $3.8 million request be granted and that the program be retained by the Air Force.

West Germany’s interest in the harassment drone was sparked by USAF demonstrations in that country in 1977. The present initial operational capability date for introduction of the new weapon system is 1982.
Aviation Week 28th August 1978
 
Two potential contenders for the upcoming USAF/West German harassment vehicle (mini-drone) competition are the canister launched design (left), with folding or pivoting wing, tail surfaces and twin-bladed midsection propeller, developed by Messerschmitt-Boelkow-Blohm, which is teamed with Teledyne Brown Engineering, and the Northrop design (right), displayed at recent Army Assn. meeting. The Northrop vehicle has gross weight of 145 Ib., can carry a 50-Ib. payload and has 4-hr. endurance.
Aviation Week 4th Dec 1978
 

Attachments

  • Northrop-Harrassment-Drone.jpg
    Northrop-Harrassment-Drone.jpg
    580.4 KB · Views: 43
Last edited:
znorthrop-ventura-nv-135-3v-jpg.208462


 
Radar Harassment Drone Tested

Messerschmitt-Boelkow-Blohm Locust mini-drone for use against radar in an air defense system leaves its launcher during recent tests in Germany.
Partly funded by the West German ministry of defense, the system is being developed in conjunction with Teledyne Brown Engineering of Huntsville, Ala., and features a terminal phase guidance system developed by Motorola. The drone, launched by a booster from a storage and transport container, is 7.2 ft. long, has an 8.5-ft. wing span, diameter of 6 in. and weighs 155 lb.
Aviation Week 3rd Sept 1979
 

Attachments

  • MBB-Locust-Harrassment-Drone.jpg
    MBB-Locust-Harrassment-Drone.jpg
    642.4 KB · Views: 35
Apparently, Locust was from "Low-Cost Expendable Harassment Vehicle". Lots of useful stuff here, plus more references to pursue.

The US Air Force and the Luftwaffe, Germany’s air force, began to coordinate work on one-way attack drones as early as 1975 (US Congress 1979, 589). In testimony before Congress in January 1976, Col. Newbold, a USAF official, described a high level of collaboration between Tactical Air Command and the Luftwaffe on the development of the harassment drone, and said that the German government was interested in sharing the costs of the project (US Congress 1976, 5199). According to Newbold, a joint USAF and West German team had recently moved to Nellis Air Force Base to test the warheads on the harassment drone. Indeed, in 1976 and 1977, the Air Force and Luftwaffe conducted a series of demonstrations of the harassment drone concept at Nellis and at Meppen Test Range in Germany, which involved an E-Systems E-55, a larger variant of the E-45, and a hydraulic launcher provided by Dornier (Jane’s 1979, 642; Aviation Week 1977, 83). Germany’s interest in anti-radar drones appears, at least initially, to have been driven by a desire to reduce the cost and risks associated with the air defense suppression mission. In a 1983 interview with Wehrtechnik, Col. Dieter Brunke, a Luftwaffe official responsible for tactical attack reconnaissance programs on the Armed Forces Staff, recalled that it was Israel’s use of drones in the 1973 October War that had inspired the Luftwaffe’s interest in anti-radar drones (Wehrtechnik 1983, 96). According to Brunke, the service began outlining requirements for an anti-radar drone in 1974, before issuing a “Tactical Request” for the drone in 1975. The project was initially known as the Kleindrohne Anti-Radar (KDAR), which Germany simplified to Drohne Anti-Radar (DAR) in the 1980s. “Here we see in the small drone antiradar the more cost-effective device, which can be manufactured in large numbers, and also is of ammunitionlike character, so that in this special mission it can replace manned systems,” explained Brunke (Wehrtechnik 1983, 96). Dornier unveiled its Mini-RPV at the Paris Air Show in May 1977 (Jane’s 1979, 619). Constructed of a fiberglass shell, the tailless, delta-winged Mini-RPV was designed to serve as an expendable anti-radar weapon, though it could be equipped with a parachute for recoverable missions such as reconnaissance and target acquisition (Wassum 1977, 24). The anti-radar version of the Mini-RPV became known first as the Dornier KDAR, following the convention of naming aircraft after the title of an acquisition program. In October 1978, the company concluded a three-week long flight test campaign 20 at the Meppen Test Range (Heise 1978, 14). The KDAR was initially equipped with a passive radar seeker developed by Texas Instruments, the US firm responsible for the guidance systems in the AGM-45 Shrike and AGM-88 HARM anti-radiation missiles (Dornier Post 1986). Both MBB and VFW produced competing designs to the Dornier Mini-RPV. In 1978, MBB displayed its Locust/DAR drone at the Association of the United States Army (AUSA) exhibition (IDR 1979, 74). MBB developed the Locust in cooperation with Teledyne Brown Engineering, the US firm responsible for the Firebee family of drones, and initially incorporated a radar seeker from Motorola. The MBB Locust featured a tubular fuselage and a cruciform wing. VFW, meanwhile, unveiled an early prototype of its Tucan drone at an air show in Hanover in 1979 (Munson 1988, 49). Like the Dornier Mini-RPV, the Tucan featured a tailless delta-wing design. VFW would offer a variant of the Tucan, the RT-910, for the joint US-German antiradar drone program.

 
DORNIER MINI-RPV

Dornier has been studying for some years the development of mini-RPVs, and a vehicle of this type was displayed for the first time at the Paris Air Show in May/June 1977. A half-scale model has been flight-tested, as well as experimental full-scale prototypes during the flight test for the concept phase of a programme known as Kleindrohne Antiradar (anti-radiation mini-drone).

Typical missions for which the vehicle is intended include electro-optical reconnaissance, target acquisition and fire control, anti-radar operations, anti tank or point target attack, and target presentation. For the reconnaissance and target acquisition and fire control missions, the integration of a sensor package comprising a stabilised TV camera, with auto-track facility coupled with a laser illuminator, is under investigation. Anti-radar missions and attacks on tanks or point targets are kamikaze' missions in which the vehicle homes on to and attacks the target after a search flight using, for example, passive or active radar and/or infra-red seeker heads. For target missions, it can be fitted with various augmentation devices, including smoke cartridges, flares or Luneberg lenses. It can also be used to test missile proximity fuses or homing heads. The flight guidance, data transmission and ground control systems are adapted to suit specific mission requirements.

The Dornier mini-RPV is one of three designs (others are by MBB and VFW-Fokker, which see) competing in a joint US-German competition for the development of the Locust harassment weapon system.

Airframe: Consists essentially of two glassfibre halfshells. Wings built integrally with fuselage, and fitted with elevons on trailing-edges. Tail surfaces comprise a main fin and an underfin, the latter also serving as a keel surface to protect the propeller during landing.

Power Plant: One 16-4 kW (22 hp) two-cylinder twostroke piston engine, mounted in rear of fuselage and driving a four-blade pusher propeller. Fuel in two fuselage tanks; provision to install a third tank in centre of fuselage instead of main recovery parachute. Provision for booster engine for launch.

Launch and Recovery: During initial flight tests, drone was launched by catapult from hydraulically operated launching sled. When required for re-use, the RPV is fitted with an electro-mechanically deployed parachute recovery system (drogue parachute in fin-tip fairing, main parachute in centre-fuselage), activated by radio command, with automatic activation in the event of onboard systems failure. Inflatable airbags to absorb landing impact. For expendable missions, parachute can be replaced by an additional fuel tank or other equipment.

Guidance and Control: Automatic or remote radio command guidance system. Aerodynamic control by elevons.

Dimensions, external:
Wing span 200 m (6 ft 6% in)
Length overall 2- 10 m (6 ft lOVi in)

Dimensions, internal:
Payload compartment: Length 0-60 m (1 ft IIV2 in)
Diameter 0-20 m (8 in)

Weights:
Payload 15 kg (33 lb)
Max launching weight 70 kg (154 lb)

Performance:
Max diving speed 194 knots (360 km/h; 223 mph)
Max level speed at S/L, ISA
135 knots (250 km/h: 155 mph)
Max operating height 3,000 m (9,850 ft)
Max endurance 3 h

MBB HARASSMENT DRONE

This miniature drone is being developed under Federal German Ministry of Defence contract, to combat the radar units of enemy air defence installations. The drone is launched by means of a booster directly from its storage and transport container. When inside the container the wings, control surfaces and propeller are folded; they flip out for use immediately upon launch. Designed to search for, and attack, enemy air defence radars, this small RPV was evolved in collaboration with Teledyne Brown Engineering of Huntsville, Alabama, USA. Components for the terminal guidance system are
manufactured by Motorola.

VFW-FOKKER MINI-RPV

To meet a German Defence Ministry requirement, VFW-Fokker is developing a catapult-launched mini-RPV of canard configuration. The first prototype,
designed in association with Northrop of the USA,
had a tapered wing and was powered by a 1-5 kW (2 hp) piston engine, mounted at the extreme tail and driving a twoblade pusher propeller. This prototype carried no telemetry equipment and had a weight of only 5 kg (1 1 lb). After a period of training for the pilot, with the model in a wind tunnel, it made free flights at up to 52 knots (96 km/h; 60 mph) after take-off from a moving motorcar.

The second prototype, which was displayed at the 1978 Hanover Air Show, was described as the Mini-RPV 2012. It has constant-chord wings, a 4-5 kW (6 hp) single cylinder piston engine and onboard telemetry equipment, increasing the take-off weight to 20 kg (44 lb). Its general configuration is shown in the accompanying illustration.

The wing has a Wortmann section, and is fitted with spoilers. There are elevators on the canard foreplane, and a tail fin but no rudder. VFW-Fokker hoped to progress to a pre-production version of this mini-RPV, weighing about 60 kg (132 lb). For anti-radar missions, such a vehicle could carry a warhead of about 8 kg ( 1 7-6 lb) weight and would be able to fly at 100 knots (185 km/h; 115 mph).
Janes All The World's Aircraft, 1979
 

Attachments

  • Dornier-Mini-RPV.jpg
    Dornier-Mini-RPV.jpg
    166.1 KB · Views: 34
  • VFW-Fokker-Harrassment-Drone.jpg
    VFW-Fokker-Harrassment-Drone.jpg
    79.2 KB · Views: 34
Last edited:
Programs alternately known as Very Low Cost Expendable Harassment Vehicle ( VLCEHV ) and LOCUST. Designs for a low- altitude battlefield RPV for surveillance, target laser designation, weapons delivery, and ELINT gathering, all - weather, day- and- night operations, low- observables technology.

Models built by McDonnell Douglas, Philco - Ford ( Praeire and Calere ) , Lockheed ( Aequare ) , Northrop ( NV- 135 ) , and ESystems ( E- 45/Axillary )

Dates: 1972-1976



Information on E-45 Axillary is here: https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/threads/axillary-uav.25532/
 
Last edited:
Ryan model list has:

Model 272 - (Project) USAF harassment vehicle RPV
 
Last edited:
For the German anti-radar drone requirement Boeing and BGT offered the Brave 200 in competition with the Dornier design. Boeing also developed a larger version, the Brave 3000 that was almost a miniature cruise missile.
 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    85.5 KB · Views: 28
  • 2.png
    2.png
    155.3 KB · Views: 26
  • 3.png
    3.png
    304.6 KB · Views: 25
  • 4.png
    4.png
    337.2 KB · Views: 29
  • Hornisse.jpg
    Hornisse.jpg
    698.5 KB · Views: 31
  • BRAVE3000.jpg
    BRAVE3000.jpg
    1.6 MB · Views: 39
Last edited:
For the German anti-radar drone requirement Boeing and BGT offered the Brave 200 in competition with the Dornier design. Boeing also developed a larger version, the Brave 3000 that was almost a miniature cruise missile.
I'm guessing that is later, in the early/mid 1980s.
 
For the German anti-radar drone requirement Boeing and BGT offered the Brave 200 in competition with the Dornier design. Boeing also developed a larger version, the Brave 3000 that was almost a miniature cruise missile.
I'm guessing that is later, in the early/mid 1980s.
It was after the US-German program failed/was discontinued. But the german half of the project stayed basically the same and dragged on even into the 90s without ever being financed.
 
Texas Instruments seeker offered for the German (K)DAR program. Confusingly its also called LOCUST. I would guess because it has its origin in the seeker developed by TI when it teamed with Dornier on an anti-radar drone
 

Attachments

  • TIlocust.jpg
    TIlocust.jpg
    672 KB · Views: 41

Attachments

  • 426-72-479x658.jpeg
    426-72-479x658.jpeg
    46.1 KB · Views: 32
  • 426-71-479x658.jpeg
    426-71-479x658.jpeg
    39.9 KB · Views: 31
  • 426-70-479x658.jpeg
    426-70-479x658.jpeg
    56.1 KB · Views: 29
  • 426-69-479x658.jpeg
    426-69-479x658.jpeg
    37.7 KB · Views: 31

NORTHROP HWS
In January 1977 a series of flight tests that began in September 1976 of a Northrop mini-RPV, known as the Harassment Weapon System (HWS), were completed at Mojave, California. Northrop built three prototypes for the programme under a $74,000 USAF contract, and the objective was to prove the concept of large numbers of such aircraft being used to harass enemy radar defences.

The flight test programme was designed to demonstrate —- under low-cost production configuration — the mini-RPV's flight characteristics, including speed, altitude, climb rate, endurance, stability and loitering capability. The vehicles were subjected to various flight manoeuvres to test their ability to perform harassment missions.

The HWS APVs are essentially “Flying wings” with a 2.13m wing span. Each weighs 40kg and is powered by a 10 horsepower engine. Northrop fabricated the major portions of the prototype airframes from plastic, using rotational moulding techniques developed by the toy and recreational vehicle industries. With this process parts are formed by pouring powdered resin into a mould, applying heat and then spinning it into the desired shape. This method significantly reduces manufacturing time, improves
overall quality, and readily lends itself to mass production During the tests an altitude of 1676m was achieved, and a duration of 46.5 minutes at speeds up to 296km/h

MANUFACTURER
Northrop Corporation, Ventura Division, Newbury
Park, California 91320, USA.
Jane's Weapon Systems 1979-1980
 

Attachments

  • 1_c98070e14f1d9e30a6b3607b6a7c18d7 (2).jpg
    1_c98070e14f1d9e30a6b3607b6a7c18d7 (2).jpg
    158.1 KB · Views: 11
  • 1_c98070e14f1d9e30a6b3607b6a7c18d7 (1).jpg
    1_c98070e14f1d9e30a6b3607b6a7c18d7 (1).jpg
    115.9 KB · Views: 9
  • 1_c98070e14f1d9e30a6b3607b6a7c18d7.jpg
    1_c98070e14f1d9e30a6b3607b6a7c18d7.jpg
    108.9 KB · Views: 12
1978 MBB-Concept (in colaboration with Teledyne Ryan) of an anti-radar-small-drone
Model 272 - (Project) USAF harassment vehicle RPV
Considering the fact that Ryan Model Numbers are mostly assigned chronologically, Model 272 would be a 1975 project or about.
There is a Model 309 "Locust" that is supposed to be a project for a single-seat aircraft with straight wings, tip tanks and mixed-power.
The MBB-Ryan project could be the Model 303, a UAV mentioned as a circa 1978 project for which I have no details.
 
Last edited:
As for the BQM-106, Ryan DID produce a new version of it in 1985-86 under the designation Model 328.
From William Wagner's Fireflies and other UAVs (Aerofax, 1992):
 

Attachments

  • 1705412893585.png
    1705412893585.png
    1.5 MB · Views: 14
  • 1705412921714.png
    1705412921714.png
    1.4 MB · Views: 17
  • 1705412943863.png
    1705412943863.png
    2.9 MB · Views: 20
Last edited:
Considering the fact that Ryan Model Numbers are mostly assigned chronologically, Model 272 would be a 1975 project or about.
There is a Model 309 "Locust" that is supposed to be a project for a single-seat aircraft with straight wings, tip tanks and mixed-power.
The MBB-Ryan project could be the Model 303, a UAV mentioned as a circa 1978 project for which I have no details.
As for the BQM-106, Ryan DID produce a new version of it in 1985-86 under the designation Model 328.
Model 272 would likely be contemporaneous with Northrop NV-135 HWS, which is earlier than the US/German studies.
 
We might be getting a little closer to Ryan's "Harrassment Vehicle" thanks to a report (actually a Wright-Patterson-controlled thesis) designated VERY LOW COST EXPENDABLE HARASSMENT SYSTEM DESIGN STUDY. It was released in December 1975.

"This study investigated the design and emplementation of a decoy mini-drone (Type II) when employed with an attack vehicle- (Type I) under the very low-cost
harassment vehicle concept. A systems approach was used with the harassment system divided into eight areas of analysis: Mission, Airframe, Stability, Propulsion, Navigation, Electrical Power, Launcher, and Cost. The overriding constraint of this study was low cost. (...) The report consists of three volumes, the first two of which are classified SECRET."
The last sentence apparently still holds, since only Volume III is available online. I can't share it here because of its size. Three possible designs are presented in the introduction (first image), but only the twin-boom one is studied in detail (images 2-5). You'll notice that the top one, presented as the BQM-106, is very different from the known design of the XBQM-106A series (produced by the USAF's Flight Research Laboratory (FRL) (except for two examples produced by Ryan). I had read before that there had been a prior version, and this seems to confirm it. That doesn't mean the first one is the Ryan proposal though,. The second design with canards looks a bit like a Rutan. The third one could also be the Ryan design, given the fact that Ryan later worked on the Model 410 twin-boom OPV.
Also worthy of note is the existence of several low-cost RPV studies and/or Mini-RPV studies which were all developed by Ryan Aeronautical at the same time or about, between 1972 and 1974 (dates indicate assignment of model number). The first three are particularly relevant to the subject. The next two pertain to the development of the Manta Ray design, but I chose to list them here because it seems that the two lines of development (Low-Cost RPVs / Mini-RPVs) didn't have a clear-cut separation back then. That fact is evidenced by an article from a January 1975 issue of the DOD's magazine Commanders Digest (see last attachment). It has the Manta Ray mockup on its cover, and covers very thoroughly the scope of Mini-RPV / Low-Cost-RPV studies. I will also attach said article in the Model 262 topic.
  • Model 250: Low Cost Drone, no details, unsolicited proposal (Mar. 72)
  • Model 253 SHILOC: Small HI-performance LOw-Cost drone, unsolicited proposal (Jan. 73)
  • LITTLE 'R' RPV System Technology Demonstrator for U.S. Army (the above report mentions "Little 'R'" as a Lockheed engine tested on Mini-RPVs)
  • Model 256: Mini-RPV demonstrator, unsolicited proposal (the 2/3-scale, yellow test version of the Manta Ray) (Oct. 73)
  • Model 268 RPAODS: Mini RPV, a derivative of the Model 262 for U.S. Army; lost to LMSC Aquila
  • Model 272: Harrassment Vehicle for USAF
 

Attachments

  • 1705436777970.png
    1705436777970.png
    83.9 KB · Views: 16
  • 1705436763192.png
    1705436763192.png
    76.5 KB · Views: 12
  • 1705436752860.png
    1705436752860.png
    77.1 KB · Views: 12
  • 1705436742743.png
    1705436742743.png
    32.2 KB · Views: 14
  • 1705436720165.png
    1705436720165.png
    112.9 KB · Views: 14
  • 1705436705643.png
    1705436705643.png
    87.6 KB · Views: 15
  • 1705433769505.png
    1705433769505.png
    124.4 KB · Views: 17
  • FDL XBQM-106.jpg
    FDL XBQM-106.jpg
    313.2 KB · Views: 15
  • Ryan-produced Teleplane.jpg
    Ryan-produced Teleplane.jpg
    146.7 KB · Views: 17
  • sim_commanders-digest_1975-01-16_17_3.pdf
    7.3 MB · Views: 6
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom