Rocketdyne (Rockwell) - 250-500k Aerospike Engine

Surprised this hasn't been uploaded before:

"During the 1960s, Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne tested numerous aerospike engines, ranging in size from subscale, cold-flow models to this 250,000- pound-thrust oxygen/ hydrogen engine shown at a test stand in Nevada." (Rocketdyne's J-2T-250k annular aerospike test firing.)
 
So why, if that worked, did the NASA SSTO aero-spike notion go for a *rectangular* design ??


( D'uh, we're talking about NASA here, of course, of course... )
 
Nik said:
So why, if that worked, did the NASA SSTO aero-spike notion go for a *rectangular* design ??

( D'uh, we're talking about NASA here, of course, of course... )

Just what do you think the reference to "Linear Aerospike " in the preceding message refers to?
 
As to why Lockheed Martin and NASA opted for the linear design is IMO most likely related to the vihcle shape.
 
Hi


There are drawings of a proposal for a Blue Streak with a plug type rocket engine.


Kevin Renner said:
As to why Lockheed Martin and NASA opted for the linear design is IMO most likely related to the vihcle shape.
 
RyanCrierie said:
Graham1973 said:
Just uploaded to the NTRS, a rather interesting study from the late 1960's

The Aerospike Engine. Concept, Performance, Design & Operational Data. Liquid Hydrogen Propellants 250-500 KBLF Thrust Class

http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19900066185_1990066185.pdf


Did anyone save this? it was lost in the great Frank Wolf PRON debacle. :-(

Apologies for the very late reply, I had saved the document and it can be accessed at the link below:

https://app.box.com/s/hv4mvt5waivzihxenr6vjwebdesg8cey
 
I've done some search on DTIC

www.dtic.mil/docs/citations/AD0387190

www.dtic.mil/docs/citations/AD0387189

AD0387189 has a (poor quality) black and white reproduction of this picture
Annular-Aerospike.jpg


(page 8 of 432)

caption says
"250 k tube wall test and firing at Nevada Field Laboratory"

So it might not be a complete engine test firing (then this would mean that both Wikipedia and Astronautix are wrong - how surprising !!)
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom