Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Secret Projects Forum
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6  All   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Bugatti 110P Fighter  (Read 29093 times)
pometablava
Global Moderator
CLEARANCE: Top Secret
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2234



« on: November 28, 2006, 06:27:47 pm »

Aviation Magazine Num 768 (15-XII-79)

On page 71 we find a reference about 110P fighter which was a development of Type 100P racer ordered in 1939 by Ministère de l'Air but never developed due to the outbreak of WWII.

Type 100 info and pics here:

http://www.bugattiaircraft.com/

http://www.bugattiaircraft.com/kalempa.htm

Could anybody post pics of Model 110P? Smiley

Thanks
Logged
red admiral
CLEARANCE: Secret
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 301



« Reply #1 on: November 28, 2006, 07:06:19 pm »

Pics of the model 100 that was built

The 101 had clipped wings

The 110P was to be armed with 1x37mm and 6x7.5mm guns

http://perso.orange.fr/morlock68/bugatti.htm
Logged
GTX
Senior Member
CLEARANCE: Secret
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 487


All hail the God of Frustration!!!


« Reply #2 on: December 15, 2006, 07:50:14 pm »

Try here:  http://www.lionheartcreations.com/BugattiP110InterceptorInfo.html



Regards,

Greg
Logged
Flitzer
Senior Member
CLEARANCE: Top Secret
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 577



« Reply #3 on: January 09, 2007, 05:53:20 pm »

Hi all..
I've read this topic with great interest and visited the mentioned sites.
I'm itching to do a profile of the P110 Interceptor and was wondering what developments/changes/modifications would have been required to make the 110 from the 100.

Red Admiral mentions clipped wings and the armament. The illustration shows 2 guns in each wing but not clipped wings.
I wondered where the 6 guns and the single 37mm may have been housed and how?

I ask those more wise and sage than I, what other mods may have been applied?

Many thanks
Peter
 
Logged

"Madness is the normal condition, only interupted by spells of sanity"
red admiral
CLEARANCE: Secret
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 301



« Reply #4 on: January 09, 2007, 07:16:23 pm »

The 37mm gun fired through the propellor. I assume the 6x7.5mm mgs were in the wings as there isn't much space left in the fuselage. For other mods I'd think a radio aerial at least.
Logged
Jemiba
Global Moderator
CLEARANCE: Top Secret
****
Online Online

Posts: 2888



« Reply #5 on: January 09, 2007, 07:46:52 pm »

... and I think, in most cases, where fighters got a curved windscreen, it turned out
to be less than ideal, so I would include at least a flat panel into the canopy.
Logged

It takes a long time, before all mistakes are made ...
Flitzer
Senior Member
CLEARANCE: Top Secret
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 577



« Reply #6 on: January 11, 2007, 07:37:10 am »

Many thanks to one and all.
I wil definitely do a profile in the near future and will include all these tips.
The only thing I'm a little wary of, is doing the flat pane windscreen on such a large canopy.
I agree with you Jemiba, but I'll have to put my thinking cap on to sort it out and try and make it look "pukka"...lol.

Cheers
Peter
 Grin
Logged

"Madness is the normal condition, only interupted by spells of sanity"
Flitzer
Senior Member
CLEARANCE: Top Secret
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 577



« Reply #7 on: January 11, 2007, 07:40:15 am »

PS...
Skybolt
I have not forgotten the Italian project...
Cheers
Peter
  Grin
Logged

"Madness is the normal condition, only interupted by spells of sanity"
Jemiba
Global Moderator
CLEARANCE: Top Secret
****
Online Online

Posts: 2888



« Reply #8 on: January 12, 2007, 08:49:21 pm »

Just a proposal for the flat windscreen . In fact I think, a fighter
with such a heavy armament would have been much larger.
« Last Edit: January 12, 2007, 08:52:10 pm by Jemiba » Logged

It takes a long time, before all mistakes are made ...
lark
Moderator
CLEARANCE: Top Secret
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 1041


« Reply #9 on: January 12, 2007, 11:05:32 pm »

Jemiba ,

The Bugatti Aircraft Association (www.bugattiaircraft.com)
speak about the 110P asof a light pursuit version with 2 guns.
Other sources speak of a "chasseur reconnaissense" reccon. fighter.

This is  maybe closer to the real fighter proposal.

(one 37mmm and six wing guns-2x3- in indeed a bit to much for the
 racer develloped fighter)
 
Logged
Jemiba
Global Moderator
CLEARANCE: Top Secret
****
Online Online

Posts: 2888



« Reply #10 on: January 13, 2007, 10:08:05 pm »

Well, two guns seems to be much more plausible.
Tomorrow, I'll look for the article about the Bugatti 100 in
the Aviation Francais Magazine, maybe there's a clue.
Logged

It takes a long time, before all mistakes are made ...
Flitzer
Senior Member
CLEARANCE: Top Secret
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 577



« Reply #11 on: January 16, 2007, 12:05:39 pm »

Thanks for the illustration Jemiba.
Just what I hoped for.
When I start I may add a forward hoop too...I'll see what it looks like when I get there.

Excellent.
Cheers
Peter
 Grin
Logged

"Madness is the normal condition, only interupted by spells of sanity"
Flitzer
Senior Member
CLEARANCE: Top Secret
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 577



« Reply #12 on: March 07, 2007, 04:20:20 pm »

Another little question...
The 100P had contra 2 blade props.
Do you think for the 110P these would have been upgraded to say 3 bladed ones?

Cheers
Peter
Logged

"Madness is the normal condition, only interupted by spells of sanity"
Jemiba
Global Moderator
CLEARANCE: Top Secret
****
Online Online

Posts: 2888



« Reply #13 on: March 07, 2007, 09:37:54 pm »

Difficult question indeed ....    Huh?
I think, in contrast to the britains, who built the first batches of their
Hurricanes and Spitfires still with two bladed props, the french seems to
have favoured three bladed ones for the fighters of that era, just before
the war. But a contra prop may be quite a different affair ! Probably three
blades would allow a lower diameter, compared to two blades and so allow
the installation of guns further inward. But that's just an amateurs opinion,
we need the experts here !
At least, three blades (or better six of two three bladed props) look better !   Grin   
Logged

It takes a long time, before all mistakes are made ...
elmayerle
Senior Member
CLEARANCE: Top Secret
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 969



« Reply #14 on: March 08, 2007, 05:52:30 am »

You could get by with a somewhat lower prop rpm using three-bladed props rather than two-bladed ones for the same, or modestly higher, engine output, or you could go with a slightly smaller prop diameter and keep the same rpm.  Personally, I'd go for three-bladed props and an uprated engine for the fighter.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6  All   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
XHTML | CSS | Aero79 design by Bloc
Page created in 0.072 seconds with 20 queries.